Ched Evans

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
DevAdvocate said:
Look folks it's been a pleasure but if you want to know what I think on any given part of the case "read the whole thread" and stop asking me stupid questions.

I'm a patient person but some of you are taking the piss.
Click to expand...

Why are they stupid questions? Because you can't answer them sufficiently?

If people didn't question verdicts then a lot of innocent people would have spent a lot of time in jail for nothing. A lot of them have <ok>
 
DevAdvocate said:
Look folks it's been a pleasure but if you want to know what I think on any given part of the case "read the whole thread" and stop asking me stupid questions.

I'm a patient person but some of you are taking the piss.
Click to expand...
Then you shouldn't post stuff like 'are you suggesting the judge doesn't know the law?' It's not exactly the issue.
 
StereoTypist said:
Why are they stupid questions? Because you can't answer them sufficiently?

If people didn't question verdicts then a lot of innocent people would have spent a lot of time in jail for nothing. A lot of them have <ok>
Click to expand...

I guess we'll have to wait and see. If he appeals and wins, then presumably Dev will think he's innocent.
 
Bik said:
Then you shouldn't post stuff like 'are you suggesting the judge doesn't know the law?' It's not exactly the issue.
Click to expand...

Why should'nt I? Is that the law or summat?

I've spent the better part of two days trying to explain the law and why I think he was convicted so you'll forgive me if I don't plan to explain it all again for your benefit because you are to idle to go back and read all the thread.

<ok>
 
StereoTypist said:
Why are they stupid questions? Because you can't answer them sufficiently?

If people didn't question verdicts then a lot of innocent people would have spent a lot of time in jail for nothing. A lot of them have
Click to expand...

No because you are asking questions which I have already answered several times over.
 
DevAdvocate said:
Why should'nt I? Is that the law or summat?

I've spent the better part of two days trying to explain the law and why I think he was convicted so you'll forgive me if I don't plan to explain it all again for your benefit because you are to idle to go back and read all the thread.

<ok>
Click to expand...

I've read the thread and I haven't asked you to explain anything.<ok>
 
DevAdvocate said:
No because you are asking questions which I have already answered several times over.
Click to expand...

You haven't answered them at all. All you've done is cut and paste quotes from newspapers which doesn't clear up anything. In fact, most of your answers have just added to the confusion.

Now, I'm not one for usually arguing with you Dev. I agree with a lot of what you say. There have also been a few threads on GC over the past year or so relating to court verdicts (Amanda Knox for example) and I've never once argued the toss either way with the results but something about the Chad Evans case just doesn't add up to me and to others.

That's why I keep asking the question of how one man having sex with a very drunk woman (who is incapable of giving consent) is seen as rape while another man who did the exact same thing is found innocent.

Nothing you've said has sufficiently explained how that is possible.
 
Goddam justice system making it harder for a decent bloke to have a good night oot <grr>
 
if it helps, i know someone who worked at man city when he was there and he says evans is dumb as **** e.g finds it hard to string a sentence together
 
Skinman Bok:2691153 said:
if it helps, i know someone who worked at man city when he was there and he says evans is dumb as **** e.g finds it hard to string a sentence together
Click to expand...

Yeah, I heard he was so thick he couldn't understand the word NO
 
At least he's in the League 1 Team of the Year. <whistle>
I'm sure that'll make up for his recent disappointment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back