Blimey! And you complain about the commentators chatting while the game is on.Agree, beautiful place. My ex out-laws live in L'Escala, there are some nice (almost untrod by tourists) places such as Tamariu and Empurias yet most tourists by-pass it (literally) for Blanca and Del Sol.
Blimey! And you complain about the commentators chatting while the game is on.

I am sure it makes you feel better to know that Hayes is not even appearing on our bench.well done to charlton today,at least i have my bet still intact ,as for wycombe we are down ,a disgraceful performance today,maybe when i visit your ground in a couple of weeks time and we suffer a hiding i can at least walk away knowing my 800 quid winnings is safe.![]()
Thanks Jeffers. Your comments exactly confirm the impressions I got from the radio commentary but always great to hear from fans who were there. Except that you call it an "ugly" win. Obviously it was a close shave, but it didn't sound "ugly" like some of our other matches where both teams slogged it out in a crowded midfield for 90 minutes. It sounded rather open and entertaining as the total of shots on target would suggest. What was your view on that, because a good radio commentator can make a silk purse out of a sow's ear?Just got back from the game. Delighted with the three points, not sure about some aspects of the performance, but at this end of the season it's the ugly 1-0 wins that count. Comments about a few of the players today- Solly had a great game but in my opinion should've been sent off in the second half, his tackle was far worse than Hollands'. Centre backs were great, despite the nerves, nothing really looked like going past them in that second half. Pritchard was pretty poor in the first half but turned it around in the second, I think the fact that he didn't start on Saturday shone through, he won a fair few tackles, and looked pretty energetic. However he may only have looked energetic as he was next to Stephens, who looked very, very tired in the second half. His passes weren't reaching the man far too often and he never really showed any aggression and never looked like he wanted to win the ball back. Wright-Phillips was very poor, never wins a header and there was one miss in particular that was just dreadful. Special mention to Kermorgant, who got his fair share of knocks but just kept plugging away and kept winning just about every header. So so so happy with the win though, almost there now!
I called it an ugly win as the second half performance was poor, and we were purely relying on the centre backs to hoof everything away and up to Kermorgant, rather than how we played very early on in the first half, which reminded me of the way we were playing at the start of the season. Hughes should've been playing in Stephens' place in my opinion, as the two playing in the middle are both relatively inexperienced and attack minded. I would agree that Solly's error was down to tiredness, he still played very well though. I think the referee may have treated his tackle lightly due to the slippery surface as well.Thanks Jeffers. Your comments exactly confirm the impressions I got from the radio commentary but always great to hear from fans who were there. Except that you call it an "ugly" win. Obviously it was a close shave, but it didn't sound "ugly" like some of our other matches where both teams slogged it out in a crowded midfield. It sounded rather open and entertaining as the total of shots on target would suggest. What was your view on that, because a good radio commentator can make a silk purse out of a sow's ear?
Giving Stephens so much defensive responsibility worries me, especially without Wagstaff on the pitch who does help out in defence.
Those whingeing about the red cards we have received should consider we are lucky not to be without Solly for three matches. He is normally a very careful tackler (only two yellows all season before today) so I put that error down to tiredness, same as Hollands'. They have both played nearly every minute of the season.