Been to discussing this on the Arsenal board and it's been really interesting.
My view is that the two are very different. Supporters being either local, or match-go-ers that have embraced the history and culture of the club. I personally don't see how you can really "know" a club without having ever been to a game or living local enough to know about the players, club rivalries, fans etc.
I'd describe fans as people that just like the club, the players etc. This would apply mainly to oversea's fans or those that have never been.
In this day and age it's not affordable to attend that many football games, to me being a season ticket holder from Hammersmith doesn't make you any better than someone from Nigeria or whatever it's just a different way of rooting for your team.
I've had this discussion with my housemate who is an Irish Arsenal fan that only really started supporting them around the Invincibles era. He is constantly going on about "being London's top club" and hating Spurs, West Ham and Chelsea but I just can't see it. He doesn't know a Spurs fan yet says he hates them and describes them as cocky etc. (which is true) He bases this on Arsenal blogs and forums he reads. He wouldn't believe me when I said Arsenal have more Jewish fans than Spurs do. He genuinely believes all Spurs fans are Jewish hence the Y*d tag. This is what I mean though, from a distance you can never really understand the rivalry until you've lived it and breathed it.
Sky have made the footballing experience very superficial hence why London Derbies are not what they used to be.
West Ham, Spurs and Arsenal are huge rivals yet Sky only seem to show our games with Fulham and QPR, who never really have been our rivals for different reasons albeit.
I hate United and Liverpool but it annoys me when people say they hate them more than Spurs, West Ham, Millwall, Arsenal etc.
Supporters know the rivalries and club culture whereas fans don't, what are the views on this I'd love to hear from all fans if possible!
My view is that the two are very different. Supporters being either local, or match-go-ers that have embraced the history and culture of the club. I personally don't see how you can really "know" a club without having ever been to a game or living local enough to know about the players, club rivalries, fans etc.
I'd describe fans as people that just like the club, the players etc. This would apply mainly to oversea's fans or those that have never been.
In this day and age it's not affordable to attend that many football games, to me being a season ticket holder from Hammersmith doesn't make you any better than someone from Nigeria or whatever it's just a different way of rooting for your team.
I've had this discussion with my housemate who is an Irish Arsenal fan that only really started supporting them around the Invincibles era. He is constantly going on about "being London's top club" and hating Spurs, West Ham and Chelsea but I just can't see it. He doesn't know a Spurs fan yet says he hates them and describes them as cocky etc. (which is true) He bases this on Arsenal blogs and forums he reads. He wouldn't believe me when I said Arsenal have more Jewish fans than Spurs do. He genuinely believes all Spurs fans are Jewish hence the Y*d tag. This is what I mean though, from a distance you can never really understand the rivalry until you've lived it and breathed it.
Sky have made the footballing experience very superficial hence why London Derbies are not what they used to be.
West Ham, Spurs and Arsenal are huge rivals yet Sky only seem to show our games with Fulham and QPR, who never really have been our rivals for different reasons albeit.
I hate United and Liverpool but it annoys me when people say they hate them more than Spurs, West Ham, Millwall, Arsenal etc.
Supporters know the rivalries and club culture whereas fans don't, what are the views on this I'd love to hear from all fans if possible!
.....



