Business idea

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
only if the huns lose 5 points between now and then...
 
Helicopter Sunday 2005 , you never paid your taxes that season , null and void by the time this all over , your losing all your bragging rights through all your cheating
 
They were skint on Helicopter Sunday as well, but they kept buying players. Walter went out of the Champions League to Kaunus and spent a fortune on players, with money the club didn't have. Take the titles off them.
 
MalteseMick said:
Because the big tax case says you didn't pay 'em for 10 years starting from 2001.
Click to expand...

HMRC raised no objection to the way people were using EBT's till 2010, then decided they weren't happy with it. Rangers were using them no differently to many other clubs. How are they expected to know that HMRC are going to move the goalposts and retrospectively charge them for HMRC's incompetence?
 
Sky this morning gave season by season information what Rangers won , most expensive signing but saved best for last tax you were not paying through ept , 5 years ago it all ranged from 6 million to 9 million last season was only 1.4 million . Why can't the Huns accept you've cheated , you've not paid your taxes but carried on buying players and been paying them illegally . If Olympic athletes can get medals taken off them , the spl have to the honourable thing and start taking titles away , cheats never prosper
 
Tarquin Biscuit-Barrel said:
HMRC raised no objection to the way people were using EBT's till 2010, then decided they weren't happy with it. Rangers were using them no differently to many other clubs. How are they expected to know that HMRC are going to move the goalposts and retrospectively charge them for HMRC's incompetence?
Click to expand...

I'm not trying to wum, and really I'm not in the know about corporate tax law - but if these things were judged to be perfectly legal then every club would have used them. I'm guessing there was no precedent for them being illegal, so some people took risks on using them until HMRC decided to set a precedent.
 
harryhood67 said:
Sky this morning gave season by season information what Rangers won , most expensive signing but saved best for last tax you were not paying through ept , 5 years ago it all ranged from 6 million to 9 million last season was only 1.4 million . Why can't the Huns accept you've cheated , you've not paid your taxes but carried on buying players and been paying them illegally . If Olympic athletes can get medals taken off them , the spl have to the honourable thing and start taking titles away , cheats never prosper
Click to expand...

Again Harry, Rangers have paid all their tax bills up until this season. HMRC raised objections to the EBTs in 2010 and charged us retrospectively. Rangers have reasonably disputed this and we're waiting for the verdict of the tribunal. There is no decision on that yet, so no current bill to pay. There is therefore no 'tainted title' and you're talking out your arse as usual.
 
Where are you getting 2010 it's 2001 over 10 years that you've been paying players illegally , your pal Trevor keeps saying I speak sh£te , I proved myself correct 4/5 times right just in the last couple of weeks
 
Tarq, the reason HMRC did not look at Rangers EBTs until recently is because they did not have details of the contracts which Rangers players (and others) had signed at that time. Only when HMRC saw the EBTs included in the contracts did they know Rangers had broken the rules, they had been breaking the rules since day 1 when they started the EBTs.

That's what I have read widely reported.
 
I'll do it slowly for you harry. I know English isn't your strong point.

Did HMRC have a problem with EBTs in 2001? - No
Did HMRC have a problem with EBTs in 2002? - No
Did HMRC have a problem with EBTs in 2003? - No
Did HMRC have a problem with EBTs in 2004? - No
Did HMRC have a problem with EBTs in 2005? - No
Did HMRC have a problem with EBTs in 2006? - No
Did HMRC have a problem with EBTs in 2007? - No
Did HMRC have a problem with EBTs in 2008? - No
Did HMRC have a problem with EBTs in 2009? - No
Did HMRC have a problem with EBTs in 2010? - Yes

They then decided that companies were not using them as intended and decided to retrospectively charge them. What bit don't you understand?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back