Alright, he might not be looking directly at him, not sure how you know that when you can't see his eyes. His head position shows that Parker's in his vision though.
It's embarrassing that you'd try and defend him, to be honest.
Suarez challenge
- Thread starter Le God
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
Alright, he might not be looking directly at him, not sure how you know that when you can't see his eyes. His head position shows that Parker's in his vision though.
It's embarrassing that you'd try and defend him, to be honest.
No I don't want to, I've seen it enough to know my conclusion. 9 times out 10 a lot of red card offences with them sort of tackles have seen the player win the ball before hitting the player, it's the fact of the recklessness that's caused the ref to book/ send them off. If I done a spinning back heel kick in the air, won the ball but knocked an opposition player out in due course, would that be deemed okay?
Booking Bale for both incidents at once? As I've said I've never seen a player booked like that, if you have then fair play. He deserved a yellow and any Spurs will admit that, the dive was pathetic. If he deserved a yellow for the push too then Johnson should have received a yellow for pushing Bale straight after and you can also argue that Agger deserved one for aggravation... Gets a bit silly then doesn't it?
My description of Suarez is that of pretty much every fan in the country bar 'Pool fans, he's a nasty piece of work and quite frankly deserves the c*nt title, may sound harsh but I despise him and would rather not see him in the league. I don't need to know what was going through his mind, I clearly saw with my own eyes that his vision wasn't fixated on the ball and WAS on Parker's midriff. Supposition or not, I'm sure any neutral would agree that there was no accident in that kick. Can't understand why such a technichally brilliant and skillful player acts the way he does.
To be fair, he only missed by 3 foot
Why are you defending the indefensible? When Huddlestone kicked someone on theground in CL game, no Spurs fan defended him (except to say it was out of character) and we all thought he was lucky not to be sent off.
Seriously? If he had done that with no player near him he would have swung his leg right around, only for the ball to bounce on the floor afterwards. Swinging his leg WAY too early to connect with the ball.
Suarez' challenge wasn't even the worse, that 'honour' goes to Skrtl. Liverpool were kicking us left, right and centre and got away with it time and again
Their crowd, like Everton's, claim for everything, and I have no sympathy for them when they go on about perceived 'injustices' to them.
Their crowd, like Everton's, claim for everything, and I have no sympathy for them when they go on about perceived 'injustices' to them.
To be fair, he only missed by 3 foot
what do you expect HD.....its always someone elses fault when it comes to all things LFC!
evra,italians,yorkshire people..but no never a pathetic individual associated with that classless bunch....as you say...we usually are the first to condemn our own players for foul play..but then again it is expected as we are used to free flowing attacking football played by men
I am arguing that none of you are even prepared to accept that there is very little difference between the Adebayor 'tackle' on Bellamy and the Suarez one with Parker - they both got it wrong! However, because of your view on Suarez none of you will even countenance the fact. Just look at Suarez's reaction. But then what is the point you have already set yourselves up as judge and jury and passed your judgement -it like the FA's just happens to be wrong.
It's such a shame that Suarez is such a dirty ****, a very gifted player but a ****ing cheat.
How can Liverpool not see this?
1. Biting an opponent.
2. Fighting on the pitch.
3. His disgraceful hand ball at the world cup.
4. A racist.
5. Kicking Parker the way he did in his FIRST game back from suspension (I think he was on less than 5 minutes before that incident).
If he was a dog you would have him put down.
How can Liverpool not see this?
1. Biting an opponent.
2. Fighting on the pitch.
3. His disgraceful hand ball at the world cup.
4. A racist.
5. Kicking Parker the way he did in his FIRST game back from suspension (I think he was on less than 5 minutes before that incident).
If he was a dog you would have him put down.
It's a yellow for diving, not a red. Look it up.
What is it with you lot and the rules of the game these days? You seem to live in different universes...
Your eyesight is seriously impaired if you think he's looking at the ball - which is two feet above where he's swinging his foot.
Spurs fans haven't, actually, because we understand the laws of physics. For example...
1.) If you want to volley the ball, your shouldn't aim your kick two feet lower than when it is
2.) If you want to volley the ball, you look at where it is, not at the player directly in front of you
Look at the incident slightly differently. Just imagine Parker wasn't there at all. Would Suarez have been kicking at the exact time he did? No, he would have been kicking thin air. Say what you like about him I don't think for a second that someone of his ability would ever have missed a football by so much. Of course there's such a thing as bad timing but what you normally see is the player connecting with the ball in the wrong place, and it going off in some weird direction... how many times do you see a PL player miss the ball completely? Because if that was a mistimed attempt at the ball he would have missed it by way to much distance to use that as an excuse.
It's hard to say anyone else's fans have disgraced themselves after your lot gave a racist a standing ovation...
Refering to an opponent player as a dog who should be put down goes way beyond banter.
Also, saying you're not going to bring up tragedies IS bringing up tragedies.
- Status