I dare any Arsenal fan to defend Wenger now.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
As I said before there are some that will defend Wenger no matter what the circumstances - and always try to find an excuse. I often ask how long it would take with no trophies before they accepted the fact that Wenger is no longer good enough. So far its 7 years. How long is long enough? 10 years, 20 years, never? I don't think I have ever got an answer to that question.

Many will open their eyes after this season, and the next (which, unless we change will be the same as this). Some will never change their opinion because of the fear of admitting they were wrong.

Harmony amonst the Arsenal fans will only ever exist when a new manager comes in and we can all get behind him. I've discounted Wenger challenging and winning another title - not going to happen.
I ain't defending Wenger. I'm just hacking down arguments which are based on hatred rather than logic. Can't stand moaners who have no sense of reality.
 
It is worth remembering that in those seven years we have reached 3 cup finals and almost won the league, so with 3-5 different results in 7 years we could of had 2 league cups, a CL and a League title - which isn't a bad haul. Yes i know you get nothing for comming second, but football is a close game which can change with the smallest decision by a ref or player. Wenger has got us into those positions and with a little bit of luck on his side would have a better trophy haul.

You're right <ok> The margins in football are fine. Last week the difference between 3 pts and a draw was the thickness of the crossbar. Arsenal are not that far of at all, as demonstrated today. There's been no revolution since last week, but the results were significantly different. Last week it didn't go in our favour, this week it did.

This is why I don't buy into the exaggerations that we're in a full blown crisis. It's simply naive catastrophising, born out of the very real frustrations that Arsenal fans have experienced, but left unchecked to become gross misrepresentations of the reality of the situation.
 
7-1 .... long may this full blown crisis continue <ok>
 
So we have Van der Vaart, Parker Tiote, Ba, Enrique, Alvare, Cabaye, Sow and Suarez.

Van der Vaart was transfered 2 years ago not this summer, At that point you would have had to replace Fabregas, Song or Wilshere as he would have required a starting position.
Parker - Im not even going to dignify this with a response.
Tiote is a good player but he only has 2 assists this year and is for me second best behind Song. If he is an upgrade it is not earth-shattering.
Ba, Would have been nice sitting on the bench, but with RVP playing so well, I doubt he would have made an impact.
Enrique has been a dreadful player. Very poor defensively.
Cabaye - Another backup for Song.
Ricardo Alvarez - good shout.
Sow -Another striker/Our master plan, the player to make the difference between a big club and a has been, is a backup player? Really?
Suarez - Another striker, honestly? Suspended for racism, only 5 goals for Liverpool, loads of hype, good for Uraguay, Ask Liverpool if they are glad they bought him.

These guys aren't top quality stars. I don't see much here that would turn round our season and win the PL.
 
Ah I see. So what you should have said is that no one can name a player that you agree is top class and has gone to a club who we can compete with financially.

Forgive me for saying it, but your assessment of the players above sounds like it is designed to support your earlier point - which has now been blown out of the water.

The point I am making, is that it is a lot harder to come up with a positive argument than a negative one. You can't tell me that you really think those players would have made that much difference, or that you feel as certain about arguing that adding those players would make a significant difference to our results.
 
Who said we were world beaters ? I think we're just happy to be back to winning ways.
 
What you mean players like Suarez - damn right he would have made a difference.
Alvarez - top player would have been a hell of lot better than Arshavin this year.
VDV - yep, would have been an excellent option to tuck in behind RVP (if we ever tried mixing up our formation)
Parker - he's been excellent for Spurs this year. Would have been a great option to bring on when Song was ot available or to push him for a place (e.g instead of playing Frimpong against Liverpool at home)

It is very hard to support a statement that not a single player that went to any other club other than Man City , Chelsea, or Utd anywhere in the world could have improved us. In fact I would say that comment is completely indefensible, and you probably didnt mean it.

What do you mean damn right he would have made a difference - He has a lousy goal scoring record, cant play with RVP and doesn't have that good a record of assists either. Why am I supposed to be impressed with this guy?
Yes - Alvarez would have been good.
VDV was not available this year.
Parker is crap. But you have to recognise that a backup for Song is not a huge upgrade.

My comment is totally defensible. I'm not sure half of them could keep possession sufficiently well to fit into our team.
 
You said this:

Nobody has been able to suggest one single player that has been transferred to any club in the world in the last 2 years, that hasn't gone to a club that can out-bid us, and that would have certainly improved our team.

You didnt say anything about what year in the last two - you are clearly (and incorrectly) trying to suggest clubs with better finances that us (not many) take any player that could improve us, and there is no one else left.

How do you know Surez cant play with RVP? I dont think they have ever tried, so what do you base this on???

Parker is crap???

I think you better reassess your statement, because you are not making any sense.

And YOU have said that there are "Loads of quality players" out there. And you are a lot further from proving your statements.

I'll admit Alvarez was a decent shout and Van Der Vaart. However, I still maintain that neither would "certainly" improved our team. And changing our formation to accomodate a player, introduces a whole lot of uncertainty.
 
Are you still standing by your statement then?? I am amazed. Better to withdraw it i think.

You have faith that you can spot an affortable player that is certain to improve the team. I am confident that if such a player existed, Wenger would buy them. Not much difference really.
 
Now you introduce another, previously unmentionmed, variable and will from here use it to defend your indefensible position. Disingenuous at best....

No variable. My original statement included the certainty. Jayram was disingenuous when he misquoted me.
 
And YOU have said that there are "Loads of quality players" out there. And you are a lot further from proving your statements.

I'll admit Alvarez was a decent shout and Van Der Vaart. However, I still maintain that neither would "certainly" improved our team. And changing our formation to accomodate a player, introduces a whole lot of uncertainty.

Who (if any) of these players do you think would improve Arsenal's current team?

Falcao
Turan
Diego
Santi Carzola
Toulalan
Mexes
Gokhan Inler
Erik Lamela
Bojan Krkic
 
Who (if any) of these players do you think would improve Arsenal's current team?

Falcao
Turan
Diego
Santi Carzola
Toulalan
Mexes
Gokhan Inler
Erik Lamela
Bojan Krkic

Falcao - no, We have RVP, I suppose you can argue that strictly speaking he would be an improvement playing as a backup to RVP, but I think we both know that he isn't really a practical buy.
Turan - not certainly, his goals and assists have not been spectacular.
Diego - Not sure which one you mean
Santi Carzola - 4 goals 4 assists in 20?
Toulalan - Web site I look at, him has him valued lower than Song.
Mexes - Is he better than Kos/Metersacker/Vermaelen?
Gokhan Inler - 1 goal and 2 assists in 27 games this season.
Erik Lamela - 19 year old
Bojan Krkic - 3 goals in 21 appearances this season.

Nice picks and a few probably on Arsenal's list to keep an eye on, but certain upgrades, no way. You might have me close on one or two (Falcao is a good Pick - Someone else said Alvarez), but you have to see my point about how hard it is to pick a clear cut solid buy at the moment? Even if you think Wenger should get them all, It is really difficult to find players.
 
Falcao - no, We have RVP, I suppose you can argue that strictly speaking he would be an improvement playing as a backup to RVP, but I think we both know that he isn't really a practical buy.
Turan - not certainly, his goals and assists have not been spectacular.
Diego - Not sure which one you mean
Santi Carzola - 4 goals 4 assists in 20?
Toulalan - Web site I look at, him has him valued lower than Song.
Mexes - Is he better than Kos/Metersacker/Vermaelen?
Gokhan Inler - 1 goal and 2 assists in 27 games this season.
Erik Lamela - 19 year old
Bojan Krkic - 3 goals in 21 appearances this season.

Nice picks and a few probably on Arsenal's list to keep an eye on, but certain upgrades, no way. You might have me close on one or two (Falcao is a good Pick - Someone else said Alvarez), but you have to see my point about how hard it is to pick a clear cut solid buy at the moment? Even if you think Wenger should get them all, It is really difficult to find players.

It was more a personal curiosity thing. I certainly don't think all are first team but a couple i think are good players which could help Arsenal. Such as Inler plays in a more defensive role for Napoli (from what i've seen this season anyway) allowing Hamsik, Cavani and Lavezzi get forward hence his low assist record.

Lamela your response is a bit strange since Wenger has spent 15m on an 18 year old.

Also i don't think sheer stats with a few of these players are fair because some would benefit from having a player like RVP in the side.

But it was more a curiosity thing than saying they were all better.