The FA are corrupt

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Robby202 said:
What do you mean 'sticking up for'? He is innocent until proven guilty. If the accusation turns out to be nefarious then following your logic Chelsea would have been denied the contractual use of their player.


You need to understand the possibilities of how our legal system works before you engage your brain as your making yourself look an uneducated twat.<ok>
Click to expand...

Care to let me know when Suarez was proven guilty?
 
mighty_stevie_g said:
Suarez has served his ban for his misinterpretation - Terry has been charged by the police, hope this vile prick gets the book thrown at him even it if is just because he is a footballer and EX England captain. Its the least he deserves <ok>
Click to expand...

Suarez's ban wasn't for misinterpretation but because he is a racist ****. E.O.S Terry is the best choice for captain then and now and if he is found not guilty he should be re-instated and make the FA make a public apology and sue them for breech of his human rights.

****ing knob headed scouse prick.<ok>
 
Robby202 said:
Suarez's ban wasn't for misinterpretation but because he is a racist ****. E.O.S Terry is the best choice for captain then and now and if he is found not guilty he should be re-instated and make the FA make a public apology and sue them for breech of his human rights.

****ing knob headed scouse prick.<ok>
Click to expand...

He was deemed to have made a racist comment in the EYES OF THE FA, which according this thread, is a corrupt organisation? If it could have been proved Evra could have (and would have) taken it to court so Suarez could actually be judged rather than the FA and media making their own mind up for lemings like you to follow. But following suit as you have, the FA have stripped Terry of his captaincy so they must be pretty sure he's a racist. The FA said it, therefore must be true. <ok>
 
Red said:
Care to let me know when Suarez was proven guilty?
Click to expand...

The word 'Negro' means black in latin America and he admitted calling Evra 'Negrito'. Adding "ito" to the term "negro". It can indicate affection, especially when said between people who know each other intimately. But it can also be used to belittle. As the word was used in battle/contest it was taken as racist as he intended it to be.

No defense he is a racist ****.<ok>
 
The FA are more biased towards Man Utd than anyone else. If Evra played for anyone else than Man Utd, then Suarez would have been found not guilty on grounds of both players speaking different languages (negro means different things in different countries).

As regards to JT not wearing an armband - couldn't care less as I support Q.P.R. and Italy, but I thinki it should be given to someone like Scott Parker!
 
Robby202 said:
The word 'Negro' means black in latin America and he admitted calling Evra 'Negrito'. Adding "ito" to the term "negro". It can indicate affection, especially when said between people who know each other intimately. But it can also be used to belittle. As the word was used in battle/contest it was taken as racist as he intended it to be.

No defense he is a racist ****.<ok>
Click to expand...

Thanks for the Spanish lesson! Evra mouthed off about Suarez's South American heritage, but that's ok? Still doesn't change the fact he was never proved to have done anything, all we have is hearsay about what was said. We actually have video Evidence of Terry saying "****ing black ****", oops, I mean "no Anton Ferdinand, I certainly did not call you a ****ing black ****".
 
Red said:
He was deemed to have made a racist comment in the EYES OF THE FA, which according this thread, is a corrupt organisation? If it could have been proved Evra could have (and would have) taken it to court so Suarez could actually be judged rather than the FA and media making their own mind up for lemings like you to follow. But following suit as you have, the FA have stripped Terry of his captaincy so they must be pretty sure he's a racist. The FA said it, therefore must be true. <ok>
Click to expand...

Evra still could take the racist to court but I'd imagine they are over-the-moon at his enforced 10 week holiday. But you still don't get it do you? You can't suspend someone because 'your pretty sure he is a racist' because that's against the law and a breech of his civil liberties.

Its not hard just remember these words 'Innocent until proven guilty'
 
Robby202 said:
Evra still could take the racist to court but I'd imagine they are over-the-moon at his enforced 10 week holiday. But you still don't get it do you? You can't suspend someone because 'your pretty sure he is a racist' because that's against the law and a breech of his civil liberties.

Its not hard just remember these words 'Innocent until proven guilty'
Click to expand...

Why not? The FA can do what the **** they like. On the balance of probability, the FA decided Suarez said a racist comment, so banned him. On the balance of probability, they have now decided Terry said a racist comment, so have stripped of the captaincy. Argue it to your heart's content, but they're well within their rights.
 
Drogs said:
Someone phone the police after the game.

Next?
Click to expand...

Chill out, was a genuine question. Wasn't trying to be clever

EDIT:

In fact no, that's not what I was getting at. On the pitch he is saying (as his defence) 'Anton I didn't call you a ****ing black ****', so who said that he did for him to be saying on the pitch that he didn't?
 
District Line said:
Stripping JT of the England captaincy before proof of guilt isn't just a violation of human rights but just goes to show how corrupt and biased the FA is in favour of Northern clubs IMO.

I'd be willing to bet my bottom dollar that the next captain appointed will play for United or Liverpool.

We all know that if Terry played for any other club people would be more rational. They wouldn't do this if Terry played for United or Liverpool IMO.

Fed up of the bias and lac of consistency within the FA.

Some may say this article is knee-jerk and stupid but if I am challenged I would be willing to back up any argument with evidence to prove the bias towards United and Liverpool in the FA and the media <ok>
Click to expand...

The sad thing about this post is. You actually come across as a intelligent bloke. When football is involved obviously you are the most blinkered, clueless person out there but it's sad to see you go with the age old FA is corrupt bollocks which every other genetic modern football fan comes out with.
 
eatcustard said:
Put Joe Hart as temp captain until after trial as Rio and Steve are a pair of crocks

Then the new Manager can choose who he wants as captain when England fail yet again in a major tournament. :(
Click to expand...

Very close that but take out the 'R' <ok>
 
I hate to be a bore, especially so late in this thread, but the OP's title is grammatically incorrect.

As there is only the one FA, it should be - The FA is corrupt.

I know that all of us are striving to improve ourselves, so I trust that the OP will not view this as any sleight on him by me.
 
mighty_stevie_g said:
No YOU don't know what you're babbling on about you ****ing idiot:

Calling someone chinese isn't racist, saying some one is black is in fact the correct term these days - but when it is aimed as an insult i.e 'you chinese twat' or 'you black ****' then it is!!

That is why Terry is going down.
Click to expand...

And therein lies the reason why Suarez was banned.

He caled Evra a negro, which is an acceptable word just like calling a Chinese man 'Chinese' or a Black man 'Black' but when you use it in a derogatory manner or in an arguement like Suarez did then it is deemed as racist.

Glad to clear that up.
 
Red said:
Thanks for the Spanish lesson! Evra mouthed off about Suarez's South American heritage, but that's ok? Still doesn't change the fact he was never proved to have done anything, all we have is hearsay about what was said. We actually have video Evidence of Terry saying "****ing black ****", oops, I mean "no Anton Ferdinand, I certainly did not call you a ****ing black ****".
Click to expand...

Provocation doesn't come into it mate, what Evra said was not racist, what your boy said was. Its not a school yard mate players abuse each other week in week out, they have the banter too!.<ok>
 
BiasedOpinion said:
And therein lies the reason why Suarez was banned.

He caled Evra a negro, which is an acceptable word just like calling a Chinese man 'Chinese' or a Black man 'Black' but when you use it in a derogatory manner or in an arguement like Suarez did then it is deemed as racist.

Glad to clear that up.
Click to expand...

In English yes, the conversation was in Spanish though <ok>
 
Hoddle Is A God said:
I hate to be a bore, especially so late in this thread, but the OP's title is grammatically incorrect.

As there is only the one FA, it should be - The FA is corrupt.

I know that all of us are striving to improve ourselves, so I trust that the OP will not view this as any sleight on him by me.
Click to expand...

**** me its Ensil love child <doh>

Just **** off if that's all you have<grr>
 
Red said:
Thanks for the Spanish lesson! Evra mouthed off about Suarez's South American heritage, but that's ok? Still doesn't change the fact he was never proved to have done anything, all we have is hearsay about what was said. We actually have video Evidence of Terry saying "****ing black ****", oops, I mean "no Anton Ferdinand, I certainly did not call you a ****ing black ****".
Click to expand...

Did he? You are on here crying about no proof for Suarez and yet you come to this conclusion how?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back