its funny how the goons and chavs have got ratty now spurs are above them.
...God help them when west ham go above them too next year!!
The same West Ham that regularly finish above Spurs you mean

its funny how the goons and chavs have got ratty now spurs are above them.
...God help them when west ham go above them too next year!!

Five decades of failure and bitterness is seeping out of their wounds.
Even when they tried to buy success with Waddle Gazza Gary, they failed.
Blackburn have won more than them
.The same West Ham that regularly finish above Spurs you mean![]()
If you think that once in a decade is regular, then you really need to see a doctor!not even the most optimistic Hammer would say that. But Spurs fans have to be laughed at, they are the trappiest fans in the EPL by a loooong way, you'd think they'd been title challengers for the last 30 years.
So TrueIf you think that once in a decade is regular, then you really need to see a doctor!

It's about 5 times since the inception of the PL PNP
In the late 90s and early 00s West Ham were better than Spurs

True, but it's clearly a joke that some Spurs fans definitely did not take in jest.
hear this many a time when it goes all pear shaped and your given that what you dish out...man up
.
desperate


Who Spurs? To finish above Arsenal and Chelsea? Yes I know thanks
But unlike yourselves we base success/failure on what we win/don't win as opposed to who we finish above![]()

success does depend on who you finish above in the league..the more teams you finish above the better placed you will be.
ill try to get a graph made for you so you understand how the league works
![]()
success does depend on who you finish above in the league..the more teams you finish above the better placed you will be.
ill try to get a graph made for you so you understand how the league works
![]()
success does depend on who you finish above in the league..the more teams you finish above the better placed you will be.
ill try to get a graph made for you so you understand how the league works
![]()
Mmmm.
I think the key difference is we want to finish above 19 teams and therefore win the league where as I suspect you'd happilly finish 15th as long as Chelsea and Arsenal were 16th and 17th.
If and when you have a few years out of our shadows then perhaps you will view things a little different. I think the phrase is small club mentality. If you don't agree, why are you not on the City board?
Mmmm.
I think the key difference is we want to finish above 19 teams and therefore win the league where as I suspect you'd happilly finish 15th as long as Chelsea and Arsenal were 16th and 17th.
If and when you have a few years out of our shadows then perhaps you will view things a little different. I think the phrase is small club mentality. If you don't agree, why are you not on the City board?
Personally I can't give a stuff about who else finishes in the top four with us. I just get a bit annoyed with fans who think that their club will stay 'big' for ever based on recent history. All the current top teams have been relegated in my lifetime apart from Arsenal, who themselves were midtable for long periods (and see my signature for how close they got to dropping out of the PL).
True but some of your fellow Spurs fans think there is some sort of power shift in London based on football since August!! Now that's recent recent recent history.
success does depend on who you finish above in the league..the more teams you finish above the better placed you will be.
ill try to get a graph made for you so you understand how the league works
![]()

