All of these. And Astrology.
I unfortunately have close relatives who believe strongly in all of these.
All of these. And Astrology.
I unfortunately have close relatives who believe strongly in all of these.
Don't we all!
Actually to be fair I hate the thought that there are people who believe in these things and not the people themselves. I don't hate anybody really.
Oh and have to add Homeopathy to the list. Total ****ing waste of Health funding and should be banned.
. How can anybody actually buy into this?people who match their avatars to their name

Depends really. When you spend a large amount of time calmly reasoning with them and explaining the logic to them, and they have absolutely no response possible but continue to dig their heels into the floor about 'their opinion on the matter' I get pretty close to hatred.
Yep. It is extremely disturbing that this **** is actually available on the NHS in Britain. Extremely disturbing. One pipette drop of medicine into the entire water content of the earth would not be considered diluted enough for homeopathy. How can anybody actually buy into this?
Depends really. When you spend a large amount of time calmly reasoning with them and explaining the logic to them, and they have absolutely no response possible but continue to dig their heels into the floor about 'their opinion on the matter' I get pretty close to hatred.

Yeah, totally .

I do not have a problem with relgious people when they just believe in it for comfort or whatever and take the good moral stuff out of it to lead their life by. But I can't stand it when people actually use it to determine their real life decisions when it impacts on others, especially the major stuff, or when they try and cram it down you throat and have no tolerance to hear anything against it.
If an old lady wants to go to church to believe that she is off to meet her deceased husband when her time comes then so be it, I'd never be one of those militant atheists who simply has to wave his penis in everybody's face.
But the main issue with religion is that while it exists there will always be fundamentalists to correctly interpret the original texts and cause harm, there will always be concessions made (including financial support) in non secular countries like Britain and intelligent people will continue to relax their own grasp of logic to give breathing space to totally nonsensical ideas in their own minds which can, when such a contradiction exists within a scientific mind, hamper the progress of mankind.
Yeah agree with that, although I do not reallly buy the whole 'religion causes war and violence' thing, man kind is innately violent and religion is just an excuse for it rather that a reason; if there was no religion then we would still have just as much war and violence but it just would be about something else.
Definitely agree that it's foolish to claim that it is the only source of war and violence, you're spot on to say that without religion there would still be violence.
But then look at a situation like Israel-Palestine, a huge problem stained with the blood of countless people which is fundamentally based on two groups of people believing that they both have a god-given right to a particular piece of land. If it was for rich, bountiful land with great agricultural prospects or expansion potential then you could definitely argue that religion is irrelevant. But it's a total wasteland, geographically speaking, and the entire issue is based on revealed faith. There's of course also regular situations throughout the world where people are killed in the name of a particular god because of their belief in something else.
I don't think it is right to not condemn the huge role religion has played in horrors like these simply because it isn't the only source of violence. I think that if mankind learned how to skeptically view everything and learned howto tackle every thought with reason (thus let go of religion, amongst other things), there certainly would be less violence and unnecessary murder.
Yes I agree that the Israel-Palestine conflict is solely down to religion and that people are killed solely because of religious reasons, but if there was no religion then you have to think what would take the place of it. If all people thought skeptically and there was no religion then there would be less violence and deaths due to religious reasons but there might be more violence and death because people do not have the thought of that there lives mean something and that there is something after death and that everything will end eventually so why not take what you want with force or kill that person. That said if I could choose a world with or without religion then obviously hands down I would choose the world without religion.
Don't we all!
Actually to be fair I hate the thought that there are people who believe in these things and not the people themselves. I don't hate anybody really.
Oh and have to add Homeopathy to the list. Total ****ing waste of Health funding and should be banned.
I can verify this, I was once in hospital with a lady who was waiting to have surgery on her Thyroid gland, (she had cancer) she had visited a Homeopath with regards another matter, as I recall, it may have been Rheumatism, aching joints or something. She was given, I don't like to say prescribed some sort of cod liver oil, or fish oil, it interfered with her Thyroid function, her surgery had to be cancelled, the consultant was outraged to say the least.
If an old lady wants to go to church to believe that she is off to meet her deceased husband when her time comes then so be it, I'd never be one of those militant atheists who simply has to wave his penis in everybody's face.
But the main issue with religion is that while it exists there will always be fundamentalists to correctly interpret the original texts and cause harm, there will always be concessions made (including financial support) in non secular countries like Britain and intelligent people will continue to relax their own grasp of logic to give breathing space to totally nonsensical ideas in their own minds which can, when such a contradiction exists within a scientific mind, hamper the progress of mankind.

I don't think you quite understand what an atheist is Skalps![]()

.If an old lady wants to go to church to believe that she is off to meet her deceased husband when her time comes then so be it, I'd never be one of those militant atheists who simply has to wave his penis in everybody's face.
But the main issue with religion is that while it exists there will always be fundamentalists to correctly interpret the original texts and cause harm, there will always be concessions made (including financial support) in non secular countries like Britain and intelligent people will continue to relax their own grasp of logic to give breathing space to totally nonsensical ideas in their own minds which can, when such a contradiction exists within a scientific mind, hamper the progress of mankind.