El Classico

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, Real Madrid kick the **** out of Barcelona. <doh>

Discount Pepe and Madrid are no more dirty than Barcelona.

Yeah, course <doh>. How many Barcelona players have 13 red cards in their career? Pepe and Ramos are by far worse then anyone of Barcelona. That's just naming two.

How amazing is this?

Messi has 37 goals already this season <yikes>

Bet Ronaldo isn't far behind.

Amazing...

30 for Cronaldo, about 10 of them being penalties.
 
Ahh we come to the argument... would you take trophies and Allardyce-esque football, or limited success but beautiful football?

Personally, I would rather spend my money on the latter, but it's a divisive issue!

I would take the latter any day but in reality Stoke play nothing like Real Madrid which is the point I was getting at ina round about way. Madrid have scored 67 goals in 19 league games!! Dont think you can achieve that without playing good football.
 
<laugh> Brilliant post. Think you've given me a new sig (again)

I do my best...

Yeah, course <doh>. How many Barcelona players have 13 red cards in their career? Pepe and Ramos are by far worse then anyone of Barcelona. That's just naming two.

I second this ****. Kicking lumps out of Barca. Although, admittedly, Barca are pussies. Rolling around like someone's shot them.
 
So have you missed the antics of Ramos, Coentrao, Diarra etc.. the last umpteen classicos.

Its pure cynical football, and when the spanish national team are destroyed and go back to the grand failures of years before you can thank Mourinho

And what Barca are spotless? Pique, Busquets, Mascherano are just as bad.
 
<wah> my ****in heart bleeds, try 40 odd years like

Yes, but (without wanting to sound rude) you're not considered as a top of the table club, so 40 years isn't so bad. We ARE considered a top 4 club, so nigh on 7 years without a trophy is a bit shocking/awful/terrible for a club of this stature.
 
Yes, but (without wanting to sound rude) you're not considered as a top of the table club, so 40 years isn't so bad. We ARE considered a top 4 club, so nigh on 7 years without a trophy is a bit shocking/awful/terrible for a club of this stature.

With the players we've had over the years, we should have won something.

Should have a League Title under our names, but we ****ed that one up :(
 
Yes, but (without wanting to sound rude) you're not considered as a top of the table club, so 40 years isn't so bad. We ARE considered a top 4 club, so nigh on 7 years without a trophy is a bit shocking/awful/terrible for a club of this stature.

Watch it Kyle! Bare in mind we were competing for trophies between 1994-2004, and won **** all (you have no idea how much concentration it took to write a post that made sense).
 
Watch it Kyle! Bare in mind we were competing for trophies between 1994-2004, and won **** all (you have no idea how much concentration it took to write a post that made sense).

Sounds like us now, including a painful embarrasing defeat (****ing birmingham)
 
No, a fact. You ask a foreigner to name an enlish side, they always say Man Utd, Liverpool and Arsenal. We are a top side, you aren't.

<laugh> no they will say Man U, Man city, L,pool and probably Chelsea first

grow up, no team has a divinie right to success. but for a few questionable managerial appointments, Newcastles path could have been very different. I see you are looking rid of Wenger now, watch where you tread
 
Status
Not open for further replies.