Broadcasters talking up Lescott elbow..

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Dona_mara said:
So because they all support united means that they all invented this little story that Lescott apparently took his elbow to Kaboul's jaw?


wow the lying basterd's nothing of the sort happened..i bet they have all got their red United shirts on because everybody hates city ,right?


nothing of the sort happened did it? <doh>
Click to expand...

Davidako puts most United fans to shame.

Here's a man who lives United! and breathes United! The first thing Davidako thinks of in the morning is United and we're his last thought at night.

Doesn't matter if the subject is Lescott elbowing someone or if there is life on Mars, Davidako will find a way to make it about United. His bitterness is legendary.

He must be some OOT who's never been to anfailed.
 
Davidako said:
At least Balotelli and Lescott have the excuse that they were involved in play at the time, with bodies flying everywhere.

Rooney just walks up to opponents off the ball and assaults them.
Click to expand...

As opposed to Gerrard who merely attacks people in night clubs.
 
Davidako said:
Not the FAs jurisdiction though is it? Why does Rooney get to repeatedly assault players on the pitch?
Click to expand...

What about these then?

[video=youtube;m0ML3eseP4M]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0ML3eseP4M&feature=related[/video]

[video=youtube;gFhmUbHbW2o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFhmUbHbW2o&feature=related[/video]
 
Father_Jack_Hackett said:
What the **** would you know about reasonable debate, since when has wumming been reasonable debate ?

Before you read the next line kindly take your head for a **** so the information i am about to provide may just sink in -

I said i am not proud of the stamp as no football fan would be proud of any player doing that, i was however proud he scored the winning goal that keeps us at the top of the PL.





The reason i closed the other thread was because it turned into a slanging match and it was getting personal and it was not going to stop so i stopped it (as i posted when i deleted the last two posts) it was not because i had nothing more to add, if you feel it should not have been closed feel free to discuss this with Mick the site owner.


Cheers, i have. And even now you continue with the "personal slanging" yet claim to have closed a thread because of it. It's you that's doing it ! :headbang:

However, to your credit, You seem to be slowly understanding the difference between what I have said ( The headstamper makes you proud ) , and what you say I have said ( the headstampers headstamping makes you proud ), but your poor friend Devlin appears to need a little more help . Bless :emoticon-0110-tongu

So's anyway Moderator, as you can see, without having had to resort to an asterix, I've used reasoned debate to convince you of what was for the rest of decent society " the bleedin' obvious ". i.e. the headstampers headstamp was a vile , despicable and cowardly act, well done to you.


( " indecent" :emoticon-0111-blush )
Click to expand...
 
RobofLeeds said:
Cheers, i have. And even now you continue with the "personal slanging" yet claim to have closed a thread because of it. It's you that's doing it ! :headbang:

However, to your credit, You seem to be slowly understanding the difference between what I have said ( The headstamper makes you proud ) , and what you say I have said ( the headstampers headstamping makes you proud ), but your poor friend Devlin appears to need a little more help . Bless :emoticon-0110-tongu

So's anyway Moderator, as you can see, without having had to resort to an asterix, I've used reasoned debate to convince you of what was for the rest of decent society " the bleedin' obvious ". i.e. the headstampers headstamp was a vile , despicable and cowardly act, well done to you.


( " indecent" :emoticon-0111-blush )
Click to expand...

Since spelling and grammar is your thing, you do not start a sentence with "And".

Also "Not surprised that a player who deliberately stamps on another fills you with pride." I think you are struggling to remember what you have said Rob.

I'm not surprised you have a pantomime character as your avatar.
 
So's anyway Moderator, as you can see, without having had to resort to an asterix, I've used reasoned debate to convince you of what was for the rest of decent society " the bleedin' obvious ". i.e. the headstampers headstamp was a vile , despicable and cowardly act, well done to you.


)
Click to expand...




Again i ask where did i say it wasn't?

How long have you had Alzheimers ?
 
I will say that Balotelli's ban comes as no surprise, but I'm still disappointed as although you can argue it may look deliberate you can not be sure.

I've seen Lescott's elbow since first commenting on this thread, and it looks a definite sending off. The FA have let him off, have to say I'm surprised with that as it's an elbow to the head. I'm not sure of the rules about banning players after the game, so maybe the FA see it as a red card but something the ref has said means Lescott has got away with it.
 
Damn i just watched the Lescott elbow and that has got to be the most blatant action ever. No jumping for the ball or anything, just a pure elbow into the spurs players face. Lucky lucky Man City. I never want to hear another Man City fan complain about decisions when 2 of your players should have been sent off!

I really think we should incorporate TV replays as a third umpire style thing, especially for violent conduct!!
 
The elbow looks more blatant than the stamp.I can't see how they can charge Balotelli an not Lescott.Sums the FA's inconsistancy up yet again.Lescott's lucky that it's all been overshadowed by the stamp.
 
Gazautd said:
The elbow looks more blatant than the stamp.I can't see how they can charge Balotelli an not Lescott.Sums the FA's inconsistancy up yet again.Lescott's lucky that it's all been overshadowed by the stamp.
Click to expand...

Lescott is english... Basically seems to be it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back