Chances are it would stretch to pages 2,3,4 and 5.OLM should have a 'who have we been linked with on' Page 1 with a star rating based on the rumour having any substance
Chances are it would stretch to pages 2,3,4 and 5.OLM should have a 'who have we been linked with on' Page 1 with a star rating based on the rumour having any substance
I'm assuming they're all bollocks until we get some firmer news.OLM should have a 'who have we been linked with on' Page 1 with a star rating based on the rumour having any substance
I mentioned this one a few days ago. Signing a young centre-back with potential isn’t a priority but I like it.Hull City have reportedly shown interest in Sandefjord centre back Zinedin Smajlović, but face strong competition from several clubs.
Celtic have submitted a total €6.5m fee for the Swedish 22 year old.(@RudyGaletti)
He's Bosnian, so possibly someone Sergej's aware of.
That'll be why they will not want to extend the accounts date to 31 July ..?Am I right in saying that in the same way we need to sell before month end, any money we spend on signings before the end of June will also count against our PSR issues? If so then there's no way we're signing anyone til that's resolved?
The financial year runs from the start of July until the end of June, so we need to raise the money to remain within PSR for that reporting year. From July 1st (next Wednesday) it's a new year and we have the Premier League money to spend, so we'll officially sign players from thenAm I right in saying that in the same way we need to sell before month end, any money we spend on signings before the end of June will also count against our PSR issues? If so then there's no way we're signing anyone til that's resolved?
Correct, we would be including July in the previous year's reporting period so any incomings would be classed as being in the previous year (in which we're already at the edges of PSR...)That'll be why they will not want to extend the accounts date to 31 July ..?
Depends if they want rid of him, or whether we’re the ones asking.oh....yeah then no chance is there, they'd want at least 45 just because
The greatest non-signing in our historyLouie Barry £3m.
Yes - my understanding too, so if we do extend reporting to 31st July to help fiddle the figures, that means we'd struggle to make signings before then too?The financial year runs from the start of July until the end of June, so we need to raise the money to remain within PSR for that reporting year. From July 1st (next Wednesday) it's a new year and we have the Premier League money to spend, so we'll officially sign players from then
We potentially have till the end of July, plus, teams know our situation and they'll use it to get the best possible deal by leaving it as late as possible
Only a month of the new purchase so basically nothing.Am I right in saying that in the same way we need to sell before month end, any money we spend on signings before the end of June will also count against our PSR issues? If so then there's no way we're signing anyone til that's resolved?
Yes because that's our current year end. We could extend to July if need be.A slight difference of opinion on that, many on here have claimed that the year end for PSR is the end of June.
and one of the most expensive and ultimately beneficial...The greatest non-signing in our history
B ut I think as Om-ur's said above, if we buy in that extended period it would affect the PSR and we need and want to be signing as soon as possible. Is that right...?Yes because that's our current year end. We could extend to July if need be.
Not materially. If we sign iroegbunam for instance for 20m, only one month of his whole contract with us would be expensed in July. So if it's a 4 year deal that's 1/48th of the cost.B ut I think as Om-ur's said above, if we buy in that extended period it would affect the PSR and we need and want to be signing as soon as possible. Is that right...?
It'll be easy enough, they'll just chant Baz.I can't wait for the chant for him ...
