British Politics spam thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Have you or have you not sponsored an asylum seeker or legal migrant? It's a simple question. Being an ardent liberal, you must have done something for the cause.

I'm glad you are tickled over these promises.
<laugh> The last resort of the desperate gammon. If you're agreeing with legal migration you need to let people live in your house, otherwise you're a hypocrite.

What are you doing about stopping these migrants you despise so much?
 
702. The vote was absolutely flawed, it allowed ****s like Johnson, Mogg and Farage to peddle things they had no intention or were in no position to deliver on whilst enhancing their own personal wealth snd making the nation poorer, I’m sure as a nation we will learn from it… oh hang on Farage and his merry bunch of ex Tory ****wits will be in power in a few years, it appears we’ve learned nothing
And people will vote for Reform out of desperation because Burnham will fail to get a grip on immigration. People are desperate to see positive change, which is why the majority voted leave.

Never in history has there been such a multitude of talentless berks in parliament.

I despair.
 
Even if Remain had won, we would have been flooded by migration, so is it a surprise that people voted leave in the hope of stemming the tide? A vain hope, agreed, but something needed to happen. It's a tragedy that we ended up with a succession of hapless buffoons.

Out of interest, how many refugees/migrants have you housed or sponsored? I'm asking for research purposes.
Ah see that's inaccurate.

If remain had won we would have had the Status Quo which i have already explained would have curtailed the mass invasion of Illegal third world barbarians because we had the facility to ship them back to France straight away. They would have no legal right to seek asylum in Britain after travelling from another EU country.

But, alas, because the English wanted to secure their borders and stop immigration they voted to leave the EU and it's freedom of movement from what were for the most part, civilised 1st world countries like France and Germany and such like. Mainly because they wanted to stop the mad Mussies from coming in. Most of whom travel from outside the EU and were from British Comminwealth countries anyway.

So voted No to immigration and ended up with invasion.

Good Job, well done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FosseFilberto
<laugh> The last resort of the desperate gammon. If you're agreeing with legal migration you need to let people live in your house, otherwise you're a hypocrite.

What are you doing about stopping these migrants you despise so much?
Have you done anything for the cause? You must have helped in some small way, surely? Even Lineker took in a Syrian for a few weeks.

I've never been called a gammon before. It's rather novel actually. I've no idea what it means, but I'll be sure to look it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
When I walk through my local park I pick up rubbish that **** heads drop on the grass , putting discarded cans or crisp packets in a bin.

Other people see you respecting your own community & perhaps they will learn .

I would sooner house a homeless English war veteran that can't get back into the system than Muhammad from Afghanistan.

Surely resources should be used to help our own before helping others
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
Have you done anything for the cause? You must have helped in some small way, surely? Even Lineker took in a Syrian for a few weeks.

I've never been called a gammon before. It's rather novel actually.
Why are you swerving the simple question I asked?

I make significant contributions to causes I support. I also pay a lot in taxes.

What are you doing to stop these immigrants you hate so much?
 
Ah see that's inaccurate.

If remain had won we would have had the Status Quo which i have already explained would have curtailed the mass invasion of Illegal third world barbarians because we had the facility to ship them back to France straight away. They would have no legal right to seek asylum in Britain after travelling from another EU country.

But, alas, because the English wanted to secure their borders and stop immigration they voted to leave the EU and it's freedom of movement from what were for the most part, civilised 1st world countries like France and Germany and such like. Mainly because they wanted to stop the mad Mussies from coming in. Most of whom travel from outside the EU and were from British Comminwealth countries anyway.

So voted No to immigration and ended up with invasion.

Good Job, well done.
Our spineless politicians wouldn't return anyone to France, regardless of whether we were in the EU or not. Once the migrants are picked up out of the Channel, they are here to stay. We are literally the world's dustbin.
 
Our spineless politicians wouldn't return anyone to France, regardless of whether we were in the EU or not. Once the migrants are picked up out of the Channel, they are here to stay. We are literally the world's dustbin.
When looking specifically at annual asylum applications in Western and industrialized nations, the leading recipients fluctuate but generally follow these top nations:

United States: Consistently one of the largest recipients of first-time asylum applications globally.

Germany: The primary destination for asylum seekers within the European Union.

France, Spain, and Italy: Together with Germany, these four nations traditionally process the vast majority of all European Union asylum claims.

United Kingdom: Receives a smaller share of global applications compared to top-tier host nations, ranking further down the list in absolute numbers of applications.
 
When looking specifically at annual asylum applications in Western and industrialized nations, the leading recipients fluctuate but generally follow these top nations:

United States: Consistently one of the largest recipients of first-time asylum applications globally.

Germany: The primary destination for asylum seekers within the European Union.

France, Spain, and Italy: Together with Germany, these four nations traditionally process the vast majority of all European Union asylum claims.

United Kingdom: Receives a smaller share of global applications compared to top-tier host nations, ranking further down the list in absolute numbers of applications.
We aren't being replaced quick enough.

10% of the GLobAL population white Europeans need more diversity from the majority non whites
 
  • Like
Reactions: EDGE. and DMD
Why are you swerving the simple question I asked?

I make significant contributions to causes I support. I also pay a lot in taxes.

What are you doing to stop these immigrants you hate so much?
What could I possibly do to stop mass immigration? It's not like I trust any politician to do the right thing, so voting is pointless. We will end up with Reform, who will no doubt fail to get a grip.

I certainly don't hate all migrants. My London neighbours are migrants. They are superb people who have done everything by the book. They are also sick to death of the myriad pisstakers we are taking in these days.

So, you've not actually done anything to help the cause. We got there in the end. But I still reckon you've got room for a couple of refugees.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
When looking specifically at annual asylum applications in Western and industrialized nations, the leading recipients fluctuate but generally follow these top nations:

United States: Consistently one of the largest recipients of first-time asylum applications globally.

Germany: The primary destination for asylum seekers within the European Union.

France, Spain, and Italy: Together with Germany, these four nations traditionally process the vast majority of all European Union asylum claims.

United Kingdom: Receives a smaller share of global applications compared to top-tier host nations, ranking further down the list in absolute numbers of applications.
Are you saying we are not taking in our fair share?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
What could I possibly do to stop mass immigration? It's not like I trust any politician to do the right thing, so voting is pointless. We will end up with Reform, who will no doubt fail to get a grip.

I certainly don't hate all migrants. My London neighbours are migrants. They are superb people who have done everything by the book. They are also sick to death of the myriad pisstakers we are taking in these days.

So, you've not actually done anything to help the cause. We got there in the end. But I still reckon you've got room for a couple of refugees.
<laugh> How ****ing desperate.

Any updates on this 'promised Brexit'?
 
When the benefit bill is higher than the number generated by tax payers

When white British are per capita the highest tax payers, least dole scroungers & near the bottom of the list for tax payer social housing.

The Bringing in migrants to boost GDP arguments are falling on deaf ears
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
You said we're 'the world's dustbin'.

I was just giving you facts, unlike GBeebiees.
What on earth is GBeebies?

I get my facts from the Metro and people who walk their dogs early.

It's frightening that some people actually think we should take in more migrants. It's no wonder we are doomed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD