John Terry.
- Thread starter Depay Sound
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
No
All my comments where true and bring a lot to this thread so I think ill stay!
Southern Softie
Northern Monkey
they will say he is needed for the euros and has been through enough already what with the trial and everything else - welcome back jt and here is the armband
But why then put it on the Liverpool board when you know full well it would cause an argument.
Because they have just had a player banned for marking racist remarks, the same thing John Terry is being accused of.
I thought it was relevant and of interest. I honestly don't see how that could be interpreted as a windup.
So John Terry's case goes to court because a member of the public 'made a complaint' and Suarez's doesn't. What a load of rubbish. Both should be given the same treatment.
I think it's because John Terry's case is consider a public order offence while Suarez's case is purely a football matter.
I'm all for both Suarez and Terry being investigated by the F.A and banned accordingly if found guilty but I do take offence to tax payers money being spent over what is a pretty small incident in the world outside of football.
Funny how the CPS do pretty much sod all about some of the disgusting football chanting you hear EVERY week around the country.
Funny how the CPS do pretty much sod all about some of the disgusting football chanting you hear EVERY week around the country.
Nope terry's went to court becuase someone made a complaint, now becuase he is a high profile public figure , they can't allow it to pass without doing something, which means JT will have this rubbish hanging over his head until the court case. Where he will at most get a much smaller fine, than if he was convicted by the FA, this is if he is of course guilty.
Of courese right now there is a QPR fan at sky laughing their head off, becuase the actuall pictures that were posted where not shown in the sky feed, and it went up on youtube within 5 mins of the game ending!
Of courese right now there is a QPR fan at sky laughing their head off, becuase the actuall pictures that were posted where not shown in the sky feed, and it went up on youtube within 5 mins of the game ending!
True. You could say that some of the chants are public order offences.
QPR fan in peace...... *gulp*
If Terry's found not guilty, then he's got to be found not guilty by the FA. It's the only rational decision to make. (which means that they'll probably ban him for 5,000,000 games.....)
If he IS found guilty, then I guess the Suarez case gives precedent.... so I think he's looking at about 8 games out. I do think that he'll probably be dropped from the England squad as well, for political reasons. I hope not though - I recon we'll need him in the summer to play along side Phil Jones.
Between now and the court case, he's going to be able to play for England - Steve Gerrard was still playing after he'd been charged with affray and before it went to court. Apparently the Beeb thinks they'll try to get it sorted before the friendly against Holland in febuary though. Which will leave the FA time to come to a dicision before the Euro's.
Only one question - if he's found guilty, would the FA give him a hearing? Or would they just hand out punishment (that he would be able to appeal)? I mean he's already been found guilty by the high court, what else is there to argue about?
If Terry's found not guilty, then he's got to be found not guilty by the FA. It's the only rational decision to make. (which means that they'll probably ban him for 5,000,000 games.....)
If he IS found guilty, then I guess the Suarez case gives precedent.... so I think he's looking at about 8 games out. I do think that he'll probably be dropped from the England squad as well, for political reasons. I hope not though - I recon we'll need him in the summer to play along side Phil Jones.
Between now and the court case, he's going to be able to play for England - Steve Gerrard was still playing after he'd been charged with affray and before it went to court. Apparently the Beeb thinks they'll try to get it sorted before the friendly against Holland in febuary though. Which will leave the FA time to come to a dicision before the Euro's.
Only one question - if he's found guilty, would the FA give him a hearing? Or would they just hand out punishment (that he would be able to appeal)? I mean he's already been found guilty by the high court, what else is there to argue about?
If he's found guilty I'm sure there will be some process they have to still go through but the outcome will surely be an 8 match ban as well. Just in time for our season run in!!
