I really don’t like the man but it wasn’t clumsy or an error. It was deliberate. We are seeing this kind of thing all over social media. I don’t expect the BBC to be doing cut and paste journalism.
Off Topic And Now for Something Completely Different
- Thread starter Dr.Stanley O'Google, HCFC
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
It wasn’t clumsy, idiotic a mistake , or foolish as others have said . It was deliberate action based on political preference by people in an institution that is meant to be ‘neutral’ . If anyone makes any excuse for this then why should any piece of reporting be believed ? . Even if Trump can’t actually do anything legally , someone in this country should be able hold the BBC accountable for attempting to deceive the people who pay for it .
fully agreed
i think trump is an awful man, but i expect fully transparent journalism
be it him or someone i like
and anything that goes against that is disgraceful and gives a big element of distrust
That's the jist of it, the BBC should be and often claims to be better than this sort of thing.
Some people's hate of Trump is clouding their vision of the bigger picture.
In other news….Health & safety gone mad….off course the floor is wet….its a ****ing swimming pool
You must log in or register to see images
But in an unprecedented move two of the most senior figures at the bbc had to resign!!
And it’s nothing??
And the people who actually did it. Who are they? Do we know?
Are they carrying on with their own agenda on other various news items they show?
We don’t know as the bbc don’t have to tell us even tho they bang on about us owning the bbc
This is how I feel. In this day and age we have to have a news outlet that we feel we can trust and this revelation really pissed me off.
People ask is the Beeb institutionally biased etc . It doesn’t have to be , it just has to have dominant education and origin of its staff such as from a major university - as it does . So it’s not an organised collective , it just employs like minded people and there lies the rub . Now if you take it further then there are various other large institutions and authorities that are employing those furthering their own agendas for their ‘community’ and not for ‘all’
I wonder what sort of childhood she has had...not much IMHO.Look how fast she is, you wouldn't see the blows coming.
You must log in or register to see media
For me, there’s two completely different issues here.
Firstly, there’s the BBC letting themselves down and using a misleading edit when it was completely unnecessary.
Secondly, there’s the Trump lawsuit and whether it has any merit.
The BBC clearly made a mistake, they’ve damaged their own reputation, apologised for it and senior staff have fallen on their swords.
With regard to Trump, he’s suffered no reputational damage, it had zero impact on the election (nobody even noticed the edit until it was pointed out to them months after broadcast), there is no genuine case.
Is a deliberate act a mistake, not like it was unintentional.
You know full well that there's an as and when suits no politics policy on here.
Just to clarify, if you're wearing a suit, you can or can't mention politics?
You say that like it's something unique
That depends, some end up with a hair shirt too, others get a free pass.
"And we fight. We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore.
Our exciting adventures and boldest endeavors have not yet begun. My fellow Americans, for our movement, for our children, and for our beloved country.
And I say this despite all that's happened. The best is yet to come.
So we're going to, we're going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue. I love Pennsylvania Avenue. And we're going to the Capitol, and we're going to try and give.
The Democrats are hopeless — they never vote for anything. Not even one vote. But we're going to try and give our Republicans, the weak ones because the strong ones don't need any of our help. We're going to try and give them the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country."
Trump's rousing conclusion to his speech. If you don't fight you lose your country. Not quite Chruchill.
Our exciting adventures and boldest endeavors have not yet begun. My fellow Americans, for our movement, for our children, and for our beloved country.
And I say this despite all that's happened. The best is yet to come.
So we're going to, we're going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue. I love Pennsylvania Avenue. And we're going to the Capitol, and we're going to try and give.
The Democrats are hopeless — they never vote for anything. Not even one vote. But we're going to try and give our Republicans, the weak ones because the strong ones don't need any of our help. We're going to try and give them the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country."
Trump's rousing conclusion to his speech. If you don't fight you lose your country. Not quite Chruchill.
According to one of those convicted, the doctored version was played in Court in America as part of the January 6 trials, as was another similar one from another BBC programme.
You must log in or register to see images
Chuffing hell, that ballroom cost has rocketed.
