1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

The new PSR

Discussion in 'Newcastle United' started by Darren Peacock’s Ponytail, Nov 21, 2025 at 4:32 PM.

  1. Darren Peacock’s Ponytail

    Darren Peacock’s Ponytail Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    35,818
    Likes Received:
    24,820
    Clubs have voted 12-7 in favour of the new PSR.
    I'm feeling ill so can anyone summarise the pros and cons for Newcastle?
     
    #1
  2. No27

    No27 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2024
    Messages:
    12,047
    Likes Received:
    8,176
    It's the same **** redressed... Percentage based so nothing will change it's still anti competitive... Clubs can spend more than others.

    It allows the PL to instantly sanction clubs, so clubs can't front load money and try and tidy it up over 3 years.
     
    #2
  3. Rum & Black for 2

    Rum & Black for 2 Champion’s League Prediction League Champion
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 1, 2011
    Messages:
    31,270
    Likes Received:
    26,728
    Initially, more interested in which Clubs voted which way. That would potentially be a starting point as to which Clubs are likely to benefit and which are not.
     
    #3
  4. Roland Deschain

    Roland Deschain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    15,540
    Likes Received:
    13,063
    The likes of Brighton, Brentford, Leeds, voted no.
     
    #4
    Rum & Black for 2 likes this.
  5. No27

    No27 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2024
    Messages:
    12,047
    Likes Received:
    8,176
    Ultimately if it's percentage based in relation to revenue its the same thing at it's core.
     
    #5
  6. Darren Peacock’s Ponytail

    Darren Peacock’s Ponytail Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    35,818
    Likes Received:
    24,820
    So the American owned clubs voted for?
     
    #6
  7. No27

    No27 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2024
    Messages:
    12,047
    Likes Received:
    8,176
    Here we go

    images (4).jpeg
     
    #7
    G4rdToonArmy likes this.
  8. Roland Deschain

    Roland Deschain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    15,540
    Likes Received:
    13,063
    Those with major or US backing said yes.
     
    #8
  9. Obi Wan

    Obi Wan keeper of the peace
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    43,077
    Likes Received:
    30,006
    So clubs can no longer sell assets like hotels and women's teams to assocuated parties for the purpose of recording revenue. So just let Chelski do it and then bolt the door behind them. Cool.
     
    #9
    Roland Deschain likes this.
  10. Obi Wan

    Obi Wan keeper of the peace
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    43,077
    Likes Received:
    30,006
    BBC:
    "Squad Cost Ratio (SCR) got 14 votes in favour and six against, which is the minimum number that is required to exact a rule change...

    But linking the wage bill to income is not attractive to clubs with less financial resources. That is why Bournemouth, Brentford, Brighton, Crystal Palace, Fulham and Leeds voted against."


    That's the 6 clubs who voted against it, so we must have been in favour.
     
    #10

  11. Obi Wan

    Obi Wan keeper of the peace
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    43,077
    Likes Received:
    30,006
    But anchoring to the value of the lowest club's revenue was voted against (7 votes for vs 12 against and 1 club abstained).
     
    #11
  12. Roland Deschain

    Roland Deschain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    15,540
    Likes Received:
    13,063
    They still haven’t ratified that deal so there’s going to be huge huge pressure on the PL to hit Chelsea somehow.
     
    #12
    Obi Wan likes this.

Share This Page