The issue is the way in which they calculate the added value for new schemes.Money is there for investment, but in this country we have a senior CS based in London working to models designed by London for London so nigh on impossible for smaller area to get funding because they don't fit the model just a select few rich areas do
To make the cut they have to be seen to boost the economy. While that seems fair, it means that areas which are already better off get more investment as there is already more money there meaning that those schemes are more profitable as there is more money to make use of the new schemes.
it can become a vicious circle resulting in wealthy parts of the country getting richer while the rest fall further behind