Off Topic Ange has done one.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I don’t get the outrage , if I was a spurs fan it would have been a toss of a coin decision . The cup was great but you cannot finish 17th , didn’t he lose the most amount of games in premier league , without getting relegated ? ….There is arguments for either way but acting like it’s a disgraceful , unexplainable decision isn’t accurate imo . If he had lost 3 out of 4 next year he would have probably been gone , so I understand the logic of just doing it now before pre season and getting your new man in now .


He finished 5th in his first season, which I believe is Spurs highest finish for some time. He gets his injuries back, some new additions to go with the buzz of winning the Europa, and he’s up there again. You get a new man in and you have to start from scratch all over again. The players are most definitely unhappy he’s left and that tells you something, so I don’t go with your logic.
 
Another egotistical owner who thinks he can do better then a bloke that had the team performing well above their level, that's Forest and Wet Spam, who have wished for a change when it wasn't needed, and fallen foul of it.
 
He might be class act, but he’s pretty naive to try and continue to make a team play his way when he doesn't have the personnel to play it effectively.

**** happens with injuries etc cos it did with us, but you've got to adapt as a manager. Selles did, Ange didn’t, and while they won the Europa League, on paper you'd have expected them to reach the final.

That's why the Selles sacking pissed me off, cos he did a decent job with what he had, and adapted on the job

Err