Match Day Thread Tottenham Hotspur v Wolverhampton Wanderers

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Perhaps commanding the area isn’t as important as shot stopping....
People often judge goalkeepers on errors but a goalie who never makes a mistake is probably too cautious and letting in unnecessary goals.
It appears modern thinking agrees with you. I am unconvinced
 
The last Spurs keeper that I was completely happy with was Brad Friedel. Played like a traditional British goalie , yes I know he was American but he commanded his area in the way that was always the first requirement of a strong keeper. Even Lloris never convinced me in that area. Now we seem to go for the shot stopper as first choice. I think it's possible Kinsky could develop into a number one.

Totally agree, loved Brad.

Someone else (sorry can't remember who) alluded to the fact that their goal was a bit of a keeper clanger and I'd agree. Days gone by he would have caught it, but there is this insistence now to parry the ball away.

I was listening to a podcast earlier and the guy (who was a coach) said this is the way they develop them now due to the "risk" of trying to catch the ball. Blimey when I played (long time ago now) the big advantage was that you could use your hands.........
 
...
All I’m saying is, there are certain games where I expect spurs to win. Our home games, regardless of the quality of our opponents, are those I expect to win.

Expectation comes from something rational.
I didn't expect Spurs to win.
However I fully expected Wolves to come and
play a game that could nullify Spurs.


"... but I simply abhor teams coming to Tottenham to claim their first wins of the seasons!"

I suspect statistically it happens so little
in general or to Spurs in particular as to
not expend any emotion over it.
 
Totally agree, loved Brad.

Someone else (sorry can't remember who) alluded to the fact that their goal was a bit of a keeper clanger and I'd agree. Days gone by he would have caught it, but there is this insistence now to parry the ball away.

I was listening to a podcast earlier and the guy (who was a coach) said this is the way they develop them now due to the "risk" of trying to catch the ball. Blimey when I played (long time ago now) the big advantage was that you could use your hands.........

Stick the Spurs goalkeepers squad in a room with their eyes clamped open a la Alex in clockwork orange and make them watch film after film of Pat Jennings doing the job the correct way
 
Last edited:
First half was pretty decent, apart from the lack of a goal that actually counted.
Half-time subs by Wolves were really effective though and we were appalling after the break.
Our subs were too little, too late and we were very lucky to nick a point in the end.

Frank has to give Odobert and Tel a chance down the left and stick with Simons in the middle.
Richarlison's getting little to no service and he's completely isolated, too.
We also have to work out a backup plan for attacking midfield, as one option isn't enough.
 
First half was pretty decent, apart from the lack of a goal that actually counted.
Half-time subs by Wolves were really effective though and we were appalling after the break.
Our subs were too little, too late and we were very lucky to nick a point in the end.

Frank has to give Odobert and Tel a chance down the left and stick with Simons in the middle.
Richarlison's getting little to no service and he's completely isolated, too.
We also have to work out a backup plan for attacking midfield, as one option isn't enough.

Our only threat for most of the game was Kudus which allowed Wolves to double up on him , not having Porro to assist also made the job easier , Spence could help if he gets more time in that position , he has played LWB for most of the last 9 months when we brought on Sarr and Porro it gave them more to worry about but left it too late in the game
 
  • Like
Reactions: PleaseNotPoll
Our only threat for most of the game was Kudus which allowed Wolves to double up on him , not having Porro to assist also made the job easier , Spence could help if he gets more time in that position , he has played LWB for most of the last 9 months when we brought on Sarr and Porro it gave them more to worry about but left it too late in the game
Spence was less effective with Kudus too, as he wanted to occupy the same space.
Porro's more comfortable in central areas and playing crosses from deep than Spence is.
It may be that Spence/Johnson and Porro/Kudus are better combinations than the alternatives.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alfie Conn