Not really good enough for me though.
I said 8 months ago I didn't agree with his appointment after his association with Epstein, so why was he chosen by Starmer - it demonstrates really poor judgement as well as not taking child abuse seriously enough, at the heart of British Politics.
I also have concerns that someone seen as gay is some sort of defence by some is even more concerning, especially as we know some politicians in the past have been into young boys. Not suggesting this individual was, but highlighting why safeguarding should be kicking in, knowing his past associations.
I know people like to focus on places like Rochdale and Rotherham, but I also focus on why were children allowed to be moved from care homes in London to a place down on the South Coast that was rife in abuse, the owners died before they could be brought to justice.
Yes, Trump and Andrew should be dealt with, they will not be though, so let's not shift this away from what we can be dealing with and that is asking questions about what is going on at the heart of Westminster.
So is it next week, we have a state visit for someone seriously linked to Epstein, someone who will no doubt be hosted by a politician who had association with Epstein, and hosted by a King whose brother is also linked by a photgraph, seems to me we are overlooking a massive problem here...
Including our very own Prime Minister who hand picked one of those individuals. Something we can and should be dealing with, by association even if he is innocent of any crime.
Last edited:
