Transfer Deadline Day Discussion

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

What will it take to satisfy you on September 1st?

  • Nothing - SR are awful

    Votes: 2 2.9%
  • We need 4-5 good signings (£50m+)

    Votes: 13 18.8%
  • A top AM and some physicality on the wings (£25m+)

    Votes: 48 69.6%
  • I will be happy with some wingers

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • We have a good enough team. Just get some experience in.

    Votes: 2 2.9%
  • I started supporting Man City and don’t care

    Votes: 3 4.3%

  • Total voters
    69
We were at our most successful period in the PL when we had the clout to bring in some of the best young players in Europe, even ahead of "bigger" clubs sometimes. We were able to do that because we showed a clear path of "play here 1-2 seasons, get a good fee for us and move on". And then we could recruit the next up and comer.

The moment you start blocking moves for players is when that method falls apart, and young talent won't want to join. Brighton are doing what we did, but at a slightly higher clip. It's the best method of being able to compete at the right end of the PL table.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Le Tissier's Laces
What’s the alternative though? Ultimately we signed players like VVD, Mane, Wanyama etc on the back of those promises. Would we have got them if we had been firm with our “not selling” stance?

Around that same time I remember West Brom telling everyone to **** if when Berahino was a hot commodity and there were pundits saying it will hinder them in the long run because players will see how hard it is to get a move away if they do well and not want to sign for them because of it. Even back then (and likely more so now) there are no “hidden gem” players, every PL side will know about virtually every player around so you need something to attract a player to you over the others.

Ultimately nobodies dream is to play for Saints if they have the truly big clubs interested in them. We just have to try and become a solid mid table PL side again so the list of clubs who players will want to leave to is shorter than it is now.

It was always my dream to play for Pompey. In goal. I am so **** it would have been excellent.
 
I never aspired to play in any capacity once I realised my feet weren't connected to my brain in any way shape or form that could produce anything resembling football skills.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thereisonlyoneno7
What’s the alternative though? Ultimately we signed players like VVD, Mane, Wanyama etc on the back of those promises. Would we have got them if we had been firm with our “not selling” stance?

Around that same time I remember West Brom telling everyone to **** off when Berahino was a hot commodity and there were pundits saying it will hinder them in the long run because players will see how hard it is to get a move away if they do well and not want to sign for them because of it. Even back then (and likely more so now) there are no “hidden gem” players, every PL side will know about virtually every player around so you need something to attract a player to you over the others.

Ultimately nobodies dream is to play for Saints if they have the truly big clubs interested in them. We just have to try and become a solid mid table PL side again so the list of clubs who players will want to leave to is shorter than it is now.
You’re right of course but it’s incredibly frustrating. We have been that team before but since then priorities seem to have changed and recruitment has been poor (understatement of the year!). Not helped by player attitudes of course but I know it’s not just us but other clubs seem to be much better at handling it than us.