Promises or not. The player is contracted. We may have said we would allow him to leave if an acceptable offer is received and it hasn’t.It was also makes him look good and Newcastle look bad so it's saving his reputation in that regard.
Exactly, respond to what?There's nowt to respond to... It's like a tossers Facebook post. Talking in riddles.
Club may be able to respond by fining him 2 weeks wages for the content of the post. Obviously, subject to his contract but there is usually something in the contract dealing with public messages.If this is official they have to. They simply have to respond or we lose all credibility.
What promises would we make our striker? That we would let him go if Liverpool came for him?
If we got a bid of 110m that we would accept.
Absolute bollocks what would we promise him? Under contract for 3 years????
I don’t think that’s the case. Most if not all fans of other clubs are saying Isak has gone about this is a terrible way. He’s looking like the bastard if football.We're gunna see people going after the owners instead of him and his agent. It's a well played card tbh. .
Newcastle are being rinsed
Exactly, respond to what?
It’s like Liverpool, respond by the end of the week to an offer that hasn’t been made.
And then every week that he doesn’t play for us. There has to be a clause which says we don’t pay him if he doesn’t turn up for work.Club may be able to respond by fining him 2 weeks wages for the content of the post. Obviously, subject to his contract but there is usually something in the contract dealing with public messages.
Club may be able to respond by fining him 2 weeks wages for the content of the post. Obviously, subject to his contract but there is usually something in the contract dealing with public messages.
It’s football, nobody really cares. It’s just about money.It's not good for Newcastle all this.. It's now a really bad look.