Match Day Thread Wrexham v Hull City

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

City win?


  • Total voters
    68
QUOTE="Amin Arrears, post: 18574535, member: 1000140"]This reminds me of the good old days of Kazaa, Napster, Limewire etc

I recall as probably a 10ish year old downloading what I thought was a music video and actually getting a video of 2 Arab ladies having a threesome with a donkey. Me and my friend laughed so hysterically I remember giving myself a stitch and being unable to breathe <laugh>

Accidently?? Is that what you told the juvenile court? :emoticon-0102-bigsm[/QUOTE]

Accident? Not strictly. Anyone who remembers those P2P downloading days knows well, whatever the file was called that you were downloading, isn’t necessarily what you’d get.

I know I got a few surprises over the years but that’s the one that sticks in the mind <laugh>
 
The bickering is absolutely pathetic.

But one serious question please. What the hell is this obsession that you and 1 or 2 others have about tongues and arses? Is it some sort of fantasy perhaps? Not only is it so juvenile, but it's also just not right. Most normal people wouldn't even have that thought enter their head in the first place, never mind post repeatedly about it. Maybe consider seeking help?

Such perverse and uncommon terminology to have an entry in every British or North American dictionary.

Arse licker:

an offensive word for a person who you think is too friendly to somebody in authority and is always ready to do what they want.

synonyms: crawler, lackey, sycophant, toady,
apple polisher, bootlicker, fawner, groveler, groveller, truckler
someone who humbles himself as a sign of respect; who behaves as if he had no self-respect

If a few people are calling you that, then perhaps consider how you come across.

Hope that helps.
 
Such perverse and uncommon terminology to have an entry in every British or North American dictionary.

Arse licker:

an offensive word for a person who you think is too friendly to somebody in authority and is always ready to do what they want.

synonyms: crawler, lackey, sycophant, toady,
apple polisher, bootlicker, fawner, groveler, groveller, truckler
someone who humbles himself as a sign of respect; who behaves as if he had no self-respect

If a few people are calling you that, then perhaps consider how you come across.

Hope that helps.
I thought it was one word- every day's a school day. Wrong thread
 
Such perverse and uncommon terminology to have an entry in every British or North American dictionary.

Arse licker:

an offensive word for a person who you think is too friendly to somebody in authority and is always ready to do what they want.

synonyms: crawler, lackey, sycophant, toady,
apple polisher, bootlicker, fawner, groveler, groveller, truckler
someone who humbles himself as a sign of respect; who behaves as if he had no self-respect

If a few people are calling you that, then perhaps consider how you come across.

Hope that helps.
And if you repeatedly post that phrase, then perhaps consider how you come across....clue ...as a juvenile inadequate.
How that helps more.
 
And if you repeatedly post that phrase, then perhaps consider how you come across....clue ...as a juvenile inadequate.
How that helps more.

Or just someone who doesn't pigheadedly deny facts they find 'unsettling'.

And I think you're confusing me with the others who repeatedly refer to you as an arse licker. I've primarily used sycophant. But we have a few alternative synonyms for you now. We can use them in rotation.

<cheers>
 
Or just someone who doesn't pigheadedly deny facts they find 'unsettling'.

And I think you're confusing me with the others who repeatedly refer to you as an arse licker. I've primarily used sycophant. But we have a few alternative synonyms for you now. We can use them in rotation.

<cheers>

"We"? You mean the diminishingly small handful of you who are looking more ridiculous by the day? :emoticon-0102-bigsm

Go on then .... what 'facts' have I actually denied?
He's selling us?
He's lost all interest?
He's skint?
We're going into administration?
We're nailed on for relegation?
Those are the sort of comments I've countered time and again. And been proved 100% correct.
Seriously, what actual FACTS have I denied? Link?
Another clue .... none. Stop making **** up child.
 
"We"? You mean the diminishingly small handful of you who are looking more ridiculous by the day? :emoticon-0102-bigsm

Go on then .... what 'facts' have I actually denied?
He's selling us?
He's lost all interest?
He's skint?
We're going into administration?
We're nailed on for relegation?
Those are the sort of comments I've countered time and again. And been proved 100% correct.
Seriously, what actual FACTS have I denied? Link?
Another clue .... none. Stop making **** up child.

None of the things I've claimed, only that he's spoken to potential buyers but couldn't agree terms, he is struggling to pay the bills and that relegation would have left us at risk of administration -and it would still be difficult financially if we survived.


All of those statements have been proven to be substantially true.

It was also reasonable to hold the opinion that having transfer restrictions when we had a squad that only survived on goal difference to start with left us at greater risk of relegation.

But now we sign a proven striker and midfielder and you try to claim that as proof of it all being made up.

Which is absolute and verifiable bollocks.
 
None of the things I've claimed, only that he's spoken to potential buyers but couldn't agree terms, he is struggling to pay the bills and that relegation would have left us at risk of administration -and it would still be difficult financially if we survived.


All of those statements have been proven to be substantially true.

It was also reasonable to hold the opinion that having transfer restrictions when we had a squad that only survived on goal difference to start with left us at greater risk of relegation.

But now we sign a proven striker and midfielder and you try to claim that as proof of it all being made up.

Which is absolute and verifiable bollocks.
I haven't claimed anything as "proof" of anything "on the back of us signing a proven striker and midfielder!"! There you go again making **** up!!
How about rereading my post and actually answering the question? No? Thought not.
Idiot.
 
I haven't claimed anything as "proof" of anything "on the back of us signing a proven striker and midfielder!"! There you go again making **** up!!
How about rereading my post and actually answering the question? No? Thought not.
Idiot.

So you're NOT arguing that he isn't struggling to finance the club, and that he hasn't spoken to investors about reducing his liability or selling up, and that we weren't going into admin with liabilities we couldn't afford if we had gone down?

If you're not arguing any of those things then you're arguing by yourself.
 
Last edited:
I saw a few City fans in Bransholme Centre this morning, stocking up on the Ginsters for the trip to North Wales...Safe journey to all those making the trip. That's dedication....Hope you see a good game and a City win.
They are probably dreaming of Hollywood fame and fortune.