New Manager... Sergej Jakirović appointed

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
If someone with a contract gets the sack, in whatever industry it's in, the terms of that sacking have to be negotiated. There's no hard and fast rule about what those terms should be.
It's different for most salaried people, in any industry, because they tend not to have contracts as such, they'll be on a months notice, 3 months, or whatever.
I'm not sure what you mean the sacking has to be negotiated? In most cases the business decides(for whatever reason) that they no longer want the employee to work for them.It could be gross misconduct and instant dismissal,or a series of misdemeanours that have resulted in dismissal...

Very little negotiation involved,a bit of mitigation thrown over the table as a plea of mercy for the condemned individual,a 5 minute recess and the same outcome!!
 
I'm not sure what you mean the sacking has to be negotiated? In most cases the business decides(for whatever reason) that they no longer want the employee to work for them.It could be gross misconduct and instant dismissal,or a series of misdemeanours that have resulted in dismissal...

Very little negotiation involved,a bit of mitigation thrown over the table as a plea of mercy for the condemned individual,a 5 minute recess and the same outcome!!
The financial payoff needs to be negotiated.
 
I think we've got crossed lines here and I've probably misunderstood what type of business you're referring to:emoticon-0148-yes:

In my work world there are no negotiations or financial payouts for a sacking...It's "Clear your locker and security will walk you off the premises"):emoticon-0102-bigsm

I worked on rolling fixed term contracts most of my working life until 2021, from 3-24 months, and if you're sacked/let go, you're paid up for the rest of your contract, unless it's for gross misconduct - bringing alcohol/drugs with, failing a blood test, fighting, sexual assault, sabotage etc. You can get lawyered up and fight the accusations, but then get black-listed by the niche employment agencies and have next to no chance of working again, apart from Equatorial Guinea.

All in the past now for me, I'm self employed since Easter and wouldn't mind sacking myself sometimes.
 
I worked on rolling fixed term contracts most of my working life until 2021, from 3-24 months, and if you're sacked/let go, you're paid up for the rest of your contract, unless it's for gross misconduct - bringing alcohol/drugs with, failing a blood test, fighting, sexual assault, sabotage etc. You can get lawyered up and fight the accusations, but then get black-listed by the niche employment agencies and have next to no chance of working again, apart from Equatorial Guinea.

All in the past now for me, I'm self employed since Easter and wouldn't mind sacking myself sometimes.

If you hire me I don’t mind sacking you :emoticon-0102-bigsm.
 
I think we've got crossed lines here and I've probably misunderstood what type of business you're referring to:emoticon-0148-yes:

In my work world there are no negotiations or financial payouts for a sacking...It's "Clear your locker and security will walk you off the premises"):emoticon-0102-bigsm
Aye, that's the ****ty end of the stick. Unless it's for gross misconduct I wouldn't be surprised if that practice is just illegal but no-one ever challenges it, it's getting into employment law territory which most folk prefer to avoid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwoWrights
Aye, that's the ****ty end of the stick. Unless it's for gross misconduct I wouldn't be surprised if that practice is just illegal but no-one ever challenges it, it's getting into employment law territory which most folk prefer to avoid.
Good Employment Law advice is one of the most difficult things to lay your hands on nowadays.A very good friend of mine was an employment expert and tribunal representative up in my Local area(Gavin Booth,The Law At Work)...Sadly he passed away suddenly 3 years ago due to a heart attack.

The bloke knew everything about Employment Law and his success rate was phenomenal at the tribunals.Sadly he hasn't been replaced up here and most of the legal firms up my way that claim to be well versed in Employment Law, cant,won't or don't give representation any more because they normally went to him for advice....
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwoWrights
Good Employment Law advice is one of the most difficult things to lay your hands on nowadays.A very good friend of mine was an employment expert and tribunal representative up in my Local area(Gavin Booth,The Law At Work)...Sadly he passed away suddenly 3 years ago due to a heart attack.

The bloke knew everything about Employment Law and his success rate was phenomenal at the tribunals.Sadly he hasn't been replaced up here and most of the legal firms up my way that claim to be well versed in Employment Law, cant,won't or don't give representation any more because they normally went to him for advice....
Bring back the unions!
 
Maybe he hasn't been offered a job to take,maybe there's nothing he fancies,maybe his reputation has plummeted to a new low ,and yes,maybe he prefers sitting on his arse and being paid for it.

I'm sure Selles' will be sizing up his options at this moment in time too,making sure he doesn't dive headlong into another clusterfuck?
He was offered a league one job almost immediately but turned it down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howdentiger2
Bring back the unions!
As the next post says,they're still there.

I was in unions for the vast majority of my working life,as a member,a steward and a convener.The men are the Union,they're the strength,the backbone,the balls.Any weakness in that is exploited to the full by today's clandestine management techniques...I have also seen conveners softened up with gifts,promotions etc in exchange for a peaceful,less aggressive or volatile workforce.

I gave up paying my dues some 15 years ago,I have no regrets on that front.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rovertiger and Plum
Managers get a crap deal in the sense that there aren't enough jobs to go around, and when they do get a job it's always them that gets the blame when it goes wrong, they often end up with a negative reputation as a result and have a harder time getting subsequent jobs, even though in many cases it's the conditions they're forced to work under which are to blame.

The flipside is that like with players, clubs are happy to give them multi-year contracts even though they know that they rarely actually fulfill them, and that means they usually get paid off or continue to be paid for the remainder of their contract after being sacked. This is no more and no less than the terms that the clubs sign up to when they give out the contracts.

I would say the crazy thing is that clubs are so happy to keep doing it, and keep sacking managers as soon as something goes wrong. Clearly we are a particularly extreme case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ric Glasgow
Managers get a crap deal in the sense that there aren't enough jobs to go around, and when they do get a job it's always them that gets the blame when it goes wrong, they often end up with a negative reputation as a result and have a harder time getting subsequent jobs, even though in many cases it's the conditions they're forced to work under which are to blame.

The flipside is that like with players, clubs are happy to give them multi-year contracts even though they know that they rarely actually fulfill them, and that means they usually get paid off or continue to be paid for the remainder of their contract after being sacked. This is no more and no less than the terms that the clubs sign up to when they give out the contracts.

I would say the crazy thing is that clubs are so happy to keep doing it, and keep sacking managers as soon as something goes wrong. Clearly we are a particularly extreme case.

Players are assets that clubs can make money on, managers rarely make a club money. Sacking an "asset" that can make you money is very different ( and stupid ) to sacking an "asset" that won't in 80% of cases

Managers and coaches reputations within the game are sometimes completely different from what's out in the public due to the fact most within the game will know about said conditions way more then your average member of the public and don't actually blame the manager like the public eye does.
 
Except not all contracts are the same. Not all of the people listed are still on the payroll. If you need to be told that maybe you're an alcoholic who pops up spouting rubbish in the early hours.

They're the same in that if you give someone an x year deal then terminate it early you're liable for it, otherwise it's not an x year deal.

You should chill out, stop getting personal it's bad for you.

But then a **** is a **** after all.
 
Last edited:
So why don't they need to pay anything for breaking the x year contract if they leave to move to another club?

Because they're earning what they couldn't expect earn if still in post.

And Acun basically said so when Walter was sacked.

Obviously there would be negotiations surrounding whether we pay a partial amount if the new job doesn't match the value of the current contract.