You must log in or register to see images
remember having a go in Robs Invalid carriage (not on the road i should make clear) and even on an empty tarmac area it felt dodgy when cornering at 15 mph .That was around the time no more new ones would be issued and Mobility Allowance came inAh that Morgan
One wheel at the back kind of makes sense, but one wheel at the front where all of the steering and force of braking takes place just seems like a bad idea to me.
remember having a go in Robs Invalid carriage (not on the road i should make clear) and even on an empty tarmac area it felt dodgy when cornering at 15 mph .That was around the time no more new ones would be issued and Mobility Allowance came in

probably improve it tbhTwice this past week I've had a puncture and even with a partially deflated tyre and four wheels, cornering is sketchy
I can only imagine what it's like driving trike![]()
Front row at the football and nice and warm.not sure "gifted" is the correct terminology
easy solution just go back in time to
You must log in or register to see images
ah the good old days .Front row at the football and nice and warm.
The government has been making money off your strawman since you was born so they owe you before you start paying tax.I was getting it when i was at school![]()
reckon i have had all my taxes plus every bit of tax paid by my whole family have paid back plus someThe government has been making money off your strawman since you was born so they owe you before you start paying tax.
Coming in a bit late on this PIP conversation.
expected to be looking at 5bn worth of savings by the Labour government…..
was estimated at 12bn the tories were looking at.
what’s most important is that the most vulnerable and in need are the last ones who are looked at. And that tax on millionaires and billionaires is set accordingly and tax avoidance is punished….not just those doing some cash in hand jobs.

Gotta laugh at the Yanks - JD Vance, Heskgeth and the CIS all claiming that the Signsl leak included absolutely no classified information and thrrefire wasn't a risk etc - so Goldberg now publishes the whole transcript... because he can't now be sued as he has already had effective 'classified' clearance ... Donald Duck wl be pulling somebody else's hair out ... comedy gold - it's like Yes Minister...the "across the pond" sequel![]()
Ah that Morgan
One wheel at the back kind of makes sense, but one wheel at the front where all of the steering and force of braking takes place just seems like a bad idea to me.
£9B to reduce traffic at the Dartford crossing by 20%. Doesn’t seem to make a lot of sense to me and seems like another transport project to try to prove how good the highways agency is!Anyway, there is some good news, Kent is getting a new crossing under the Thames, that we've been waiting 14 years for, cost...
£9B
I done a @Welshie bold the cost.
£9B to reduce traffic at the Dartford crossing by 20%. Doesn’t seem to make a lot of sense to me and seems like another transport project to try to prove how good the highways agency is!
If it had been 50%, maybe it would be worthwhile.
My biggest gripe is that only a fraction of the £9b will be for the tunnel and the rest developing a road network to and from the tunnel. My view is the money would have been better spent on another bridge at Dartford where the road network already exists.I agree. I honestly thought it was going to be scraped, so I was a bit shocked when £9B suddenly appeared. I can't see the purpose of what it's all about or what it's going to alleviate and how, and whatever it's alleviating will it just move the problem on to another point in the network. A bottle neck somewhere else or added to. Thankfully I avoid the area these days, so I'll rarely use it once it's complete. I think I'd have preferred to spend that money elsewhere, but maybe that's short sighted of me, the proof will be in the pudding I suppose, once it's completed.
My biggest gripe is that only a fraction of the £9b will be for the tunnel and the rest developing a road network to and from the tunnel. My view is the money would have been better spent on another bridge at Dartford where the road network already exists.
From what I read, a large portion of the £9b will come from private investors and therefore will never be free.Actually you just got me thinking by mentioning the bridge, so will the tunnel be toll free, if so that's going to create a problem rather than solve one surely?
Edit: just googled, no it will not be free, it will be a freeflowing charging system.