You must log in or register to see media

You must log in or register to see images
Obsessed.
You must log in or register to see media
My take from the whole thing and what was shared. It confirms that Vance rather than being a stabilizing entity like Pence was, actually likes poking the wasp nest. Trump likes to threaten everyone, and obviously wants to be.a king and acts like a bully but hasn't actually started any wars yet.
I think Vance is far more dangerous he has no restraint. Almost makes me hope Trump doesn't die in office. Trump is a dufus but Vance is a militant who will start wars.
The person who tweeted this is clearly mischief making. No claim has been made that children are getting business loans from Social Security, that's just patently untrue. The business loans being referred to are from SBA (small business administration) the latest federal department being investigated, not SSA (social security,). SBA has absolutely nothing to do with social security or social security payments.You must log in or register to see images
I've taken the option of reading and then making a comment as most do on a forum.It's a thread about Musk, and by extension, US politics. I didn't even start it. There is, however, a little-known option on this site, should you not wish to read about it: you simply ignore the thread.
Hope this helps.![]()
The person who tweeted this is clearly mischief making. No claim has been made that children are getting business loans from Social Security, that's just patently untrue. The business loans being referred to are from SBA (small business administration) the latest federal department being investigated, not SSA (social security,). SBA has absolutely nothing to do with social security or social security payments.
It's mind blowing that people read made up stuff from randoms on Twitter and believe it. It doesn't take long to do a bit of research. If you want to hate someone, go ahead but critical thinking will serve you better.
If you are interested in getting at the truth of the matter, Supreme Court of the United States case no. 19-1392 details how, where and when fetal organs have been harvested and to whom they were sold. The Argument reads - "The People have an interest in protecting infants in the womb who are old enough to be trafficked for body parts". I assure you it exists but I don't recommend reading it. Unless you are into the macabre.Indeed, especially when they're the POTUS responding to thoroughly debunked Q Anon conspiracy theories.
You must log in or register to see media