harsh red card from highlights too
Will they be able to challenge it in time for Tuesday
harsh red card from highlights too
they wouldn't succeed I don't think wasn't a howler, just looked a harsh one to me is allWill they be able to challenge it in time for Tuesday
Today![]()
It was mentioned in the RH commentary but how were we able to make subs on four separate occasions? The limit is supposed to be three, except for half time but none of them were then. Only reason I can think it was allowed is if one of them was a concussion sub?
It was three occasions. They tagged Egan onto the Puerta and Pedro event.It was mentioned in the RH commentary but how were we able to make subs on four separate occasions? The limit is supposed to be three, except for half time but none of them were then. Only reason I can think it was allowed is if one of them was a concussion sub?
It was mentioned in the RH commentary but how were we able to make subs on four separate occasions? The limit is supposed to be three, except for half time but none of them were then. Only reason I can think it was allowed is if one of them was a concussion sub?
Legs to me is as much about breaking up the play as it is driving us forward. He was progressing us with his passing more than his drive and was covering every blade.I don't think today changed my opinion much. Thought he was good in midfield and got stuck in, but didn't drive the ball forward much. Which is fine, it's not necessarily his game. His passing was great though which is a credit to him, but thought Lincoln did much better with the ball at feet. Obviously was playing on the wing, but even so didn't think Matazo carried the ball too much from memory.
Legs to me is as much about breaking up the play as it is driving us forward. He was progressing us with his passing more than his drive and was covering every blade.
Made your 3-1 home win prediction look a bit sad