The rumours are that he’s not being played so that when his clause is triggered it falls into a different period for financial rules.
The kind of thing that must really make you feel wanted as a player.
Match Day Thread Burnley v Hull City
- Thread starter Chazz Rheinhold
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
The rumours are that he’s not being played so that when his clause is triggered it falls into a different period for financial rules.
The kind of thing that must really make you feel wanted as a player.
Puerta should have been in instead of Crooks. Needed more bite in midfield.
Hannibal off for Burnley. So the elephant in the room has gone.
Crooks would usually offer that but we're having to play him up to match-fitness.
He's hardly going to confirm it if it was true.
I'm sure you will, but probably not when he's run his nuts off for an hour with no reward against the tightest defence in the league eh?
Patience young jedi.
Apologies. I'll consider myself geekslapped.
If I'm honest I think Star wars was overrated.
That general space theme was overdone to little effect .
Must have been what 2 - 3 star shots?
More in the directors cut.
Recurrent theme.
If the rumours were true, he wouldn’t just admit we were choosing not to play one of our best players for financial reasons during a relegation scrap. That would be suicidal PR.
These days, if you don’t deny something, it might as well be a confirmation.
Last edited:
Can't say I share your confidence on that one. After the Blunts away I would've agreed, but Stoke at home hurt us