no genuine rain master in the current generation ?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
cosicave said:

Excellent point.
But when someone wants to argue just for the hell of it, it'll make no difference!
:D
I'm beginning to get the feeling some just come here for an argument without any interest in gaining a greater understanding at all, which seems a bit of a shame for any intelligent person.

But I have to say one more thing: it does make me laugh!
Click to expand...


at least i am debating a F1 related topic cc on a topic i went to the trouble of creating for the benefit of the forum , just because you dont agree with my opinion on button and canada there is no need for the non related snide innuendo which just has the effect of causing bad feeling -
 
allsaintchris said:
Good, another new rule set.

In future when the rest of us post an unsubstantiated claim it is good to know that when you ask us for proof, we don't have to provide it as we know it isn't out there!

<laugh>
Click to expand...

was not aware i have been so childish as to ask you for proof for anything
------ as you well know --
 
allsaintchris said:
I think the issue is, as ever, the OP set out to do a thread that specifically excluded the mention of a driver who is clearly the equal of any of the others in wet conditions.
Click to expand...


so because i did not mention whatever driver , your favourite who ever it is i take it - i have a personal agenda for starting the topic
------------ that really the best you can do -

which driver is it i have excluded by the way ?
 
allsaintchris said:
Yeah, just yesterday. You do have a short memory.............. for someone who can remember much about F1 from years gone by
Click to expand...

you know exactly what i mean -- since when have i ever been so childish as to initially ask you for " technical proof " knowing it does not exist as you did we me yesterday because you could not agree with me yesterday --

we might not agree but i prefer to debate in a more adult fashion than that --
 
martial artist said:
you know exactly what i mean -- since when have i ever been so childish as to initially ask you for " technical proof " knowing it does not exist as you did we me yesterday because you could not agree with me yesterday --

we might not agree but i prefer to debate in a more adult fashion than that --
Click to expand...

Just a bit of harmless thursday evening banter.

Is cold, wet and sod all else to do so may as well relax for the evening.
 
Shall we have a vote, not that it matters since we all know its me :p

Scanning the thread is out of schumacher, button, Hamilton and vettel
 
Not often I comment on the F1 boards, though I do browse quite frequently. Call me a rocket scientist but it appears someone on here isn't a big fan of Lewis Hamilton so I somewhat overlook his 'Button has the measure of Hamilton' comments. When one writes articles such as deriding said driver for his perceived lack of tyre management, articles suggesting the same driver should be sacked etc its not hard to conclude that. Though of course I don't have technical evidence to back this up, it's merely heresay... <laugh>

On topic I think it's hard to substantiate an argument that Button has proved himself superior to Hamilton in wet conditions and probably got slightly lucky with tyre choices in his memorable 'changing conditions' races. Not sure if they make him a rainmaster though as it was hardly raining heavily when he won the race...:undecided:
 
beeforsalmon said:
Not often I comment on the F1 boards, though I do browse quite frequently. Call me a rocket scientist but it appears someone on here isn't a big fan of Lewis Hamilton so I somewhat overlook his 'Button has the measure of Hamilton' comments. When one writes articles such as deriding said driver for his perceived lack of tyre management, articles suggesting the same driver should be sacked etc its not hard to conclude that. Though of course I don't have technical evidence to back this up, it's merely heresay... <laugh>

On topic I think it's hard to substantiate an argument that Button has proved himself superior to Hamilton in wet conditions and probably got slightly lucky with tyre choices in his memorable 'changing conditions' races. Not sure if they make him a rainmaster though as it was hardly raining heavily when he won the race...:undecided:
Click to expand...

That's a good comment and I would totally agree with it.
 
Marital Artist often uses the word "infatile" but no such word exists.

I am trying to communicate with the Oxford and Cambridge dictionary editors and I have suggested to them it is a word used by angry intolerant poorly educated people to use when they can not spell.
 
RI said:
Marital Artist often uses the word "infatile" but no such word exists.

I am trying to communicate with the Oxford and Cambridge dictionary editors and I have suggested to them it is a word used by angry intolerant poorly educated people to use when they can not spell.
Click to expand...


oh dear -- another drunken clown crawled out from under its stone -
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back