Sorry WJ I slightly disagree. The team fell away towards the end of the season, Summerville was totally consistent for the final 35 league and play off games.
Having teams double up on Summerville should be a good thing, we should be able to take advantage of that fact, and for games 24-35 we actually did. Summerville's performances in the last 12 games were no different than the previous 23 games, but for some reason the team as a whole forgot ( or the lack of playing experience and the pressure of the situation affected them mentally) in those last 12 games, what they had been doing correctly in the previous 12 games
You must log in or register to see images
First 12 games, clubs had no idea how to deal with Summerville
Next 11 games - clubs learnt how to restrict Summerville being a positive influence to some extent
Next 12 game - We learnt how to take advantage of the opposition concentrating on Summerville
Final 12 Games - It all went to ****