I knew you'd quote this, but if you listen to his actual words it's not what he was saying at all.
He said they analyse everything in detail to see what they need to do differently and that's how we've gone from being the worst defence in the country to being a playoff chasing side. He then said that now we're in this final stretch it maybe isn't the time to do as much of that because it's a bit late in the day and with the midweek games we don't have much time for detailed analysis anyway. Mike White followed up and asked if it means he's micro-managed too much and his response to that was to again stress, quite firmly, how much progress had been made and how he believes that's down to the level of detail they work on.
By using the term "over-analyse" he inadvertently offered a stick to beat him with to those who love to collect them, and inevitably you've grabbed it with both hands.
I've not grabbed anything at all, I think it was a good interview and he was open about what he's possibly done to much of and also not enough of and he's learning from it and being more flexible in how he does things.
You saying I've grabbed a stick to beat him with is absolutely no different to me saying you've listened to it with your Rosie tinted glasses on and taken what he said and used it as yet another reason to ignore whats been wrong.
But that's ok, you try and make my post into something it wasn't.....oh and the term he used was " I/we analyse everything to the n'th degree"
And if I really wanted to use that interview to "beat him" there was a few things he said that would make it so easy, but I'm not going down that route as it's pointless, it was a good honest interview from someone that's admitting without actually admitting it that he's made some mistakes but he's learning....that's a good thing for us all