Match Day Thread Millwall vs QPR

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Managed to watch some of the 2nd half, until the signal went down.... not surprising when 290 miles east of Madeira..... and 100 miles west of Agadir.....
Not sure how cannon missed that chance and it was a decent penalty shout at 1-0....

Other than that had a nice day, 19 degrees and hardly a cloud in the sky....

Friday could be carnage at Ipswich....
Get back to the cocktails
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trammers
Totally this.

Dykes is no good as a lone striker. He needs someone quick and strong to play ahead of him (Armstrong or Kelman?). He tries hard, but is totally ineffective in this team. Sacrifice a midfielder to allow two up front. 4-4-1-1 setup. I'm sure most would see Dozell top of the sacrifice list.

I've also noticed that Field is less effective in his current position. He is far better when he is playing just in front of our centre backs.

I'm not a fan of the play it around the back four, as they panic too easily and don't have great capabilities to handle a fast and high press from the opposition, although I prefer it to hoof ball. Would rather the wing backs drop to receive the ball forward from defence, as having Chair come deep to receive is also ineffective.
I said similar a few weeks ago about 2 upfront. A few said it would mean we'd lose the midfield battle.

As far as I can see there is no midfield, we tap it around in defence without an outlet until our midfield drop back to our 6 yard box...then we lose it anyway.

Ww need two upfront to atleast make the opposition think we have an attack.
 
Fooking marvelous, the neanderthals wipe the floor with us. The last few games have been as bad as what Ainsworth served up, no creativity, no movement, barely any chances, seriously inept defending and no ****ing goals. El Cif started well but it's all going Pete Tong now, these players are just plain ****. Unless we can miraculously unearth some cheap gems in the window, there's not a prayer of us staying up. Very very depressing
 
Fooking marvelous, the neanderthals wipe the floor with us. The last few games have been as bad as what Ainsworth served up, no creativity, no movement, barely any chances, seriously inept defending and no ****ing goals. El Cif started well but it's all going Pete Tong now, these players are just plain ****. Unless we can miraculously unearth some cheap gems in the window, there's not a prayer of us staying up. Very very depressing

With Ainsworth, we had no chance of staying up.
With Marti, we do have a chance, albeit a tough one but l’ll take that. Hopefully, we can snag a player or two in January. The season is still long enough to survive.
 
Totally this.

Dykes is no good as a lone striker. He needs someone quick and strong to play ahead of him (Armstrong or Kelman?). He tries hard, but is totally ineffective in this team. Sacrifice a midfielder to allow two up front. 4-4-1-1 setup. I'm sure most would see Dozell top of the sacrifice list.

I've also noticed that Field is less effective in his current position. He is far better when he is playing just in front of our centre backs.

I'm not a fan of the play it around the back four, as they panic too easily and don't have great capabilities to handle a fast and high press from the opposition, although I prefer it to hoof ball. Would rather the wing backs drop to receive the ball forward from defence, as having Chair come deep to receive is also ineffective.

4-4-2 is never the answer imo.
If Dykes will benefit from a second striker, then it would need to be in a 3-5-2 imo.
This would depend on our fragile centre backs staying fit.
However, I simply wouldn't play Dykes at all.
 
4-4-2 is never the answer imo.
If Dykes will benefit from a second striker, then it would need to be in a 3-5-2 imo.
This would depend on our fragile centre backs staying fit.
However, I simply wouldn't play Dykes at all.

Then who? Armstrong... 1 goal. Kellman....0 goals. Or go with no striker and have Chair, Willock and Smyth rotating in the space? Don't think any of them can mix it against some big CDs
 
Then who? Armstrong... 1 goal. Kellman....0 goals. Or go with no striker and have Chair, Willock and Smyth rotating in the space? Don't think any of them can mix it against some big CDs

Good question.
I'm just fed up with seeing Dykes being so completely crap.
The football Marti likes to play doesn't suit Dykes anyway, especially on his own as a striker.
I'd either try 3-5-2 so that he gets help, or give Kelman or Armstrong a run of games and continue with 4-3-3.
Whatever he does, I do think that the tinkering needs to stop.
 
Good question.
I'm just fed up with seeing Dykes being so completely crap.
The football Marti likes to play doesn't suit Dykes anyway, especially on his own as a striker.
I'd either try 3-5-2 so that he gets help, or give Kelman or Armstrong a run of games and continue with 4-3-3.
Whatever he does, I do think that the tinkering needs to stop.
He's put himself in a tricky position now, if he leaves Dykes out and puts Kelman and Armstrong in and it doesn't work he'll be slammed for tinkering again. He's dammed if he does, damned if he doesn't. God knows what the solution is but we need to find a way to get more bodies in forward positions somehow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rangercol
You must log in or register to see images


Couldn’t agree more. But respectfully, that is key role of the Manager.
It’s not his fault that the ‘modern’ game requires him to give endless interviews, soundbites and opinions to media, especially in house media which is staffed by people who couldn’t get a proper journalist job on the Blandford Forum Advertiser. It’s why managers collapse into repetitive cliches by way of response, because of course they are extremely limited in what they can say. If he were to be honest he’d be saying ‘of course, a lot of this squad are ****. And many are thick with it. But it is what it is’

With games now coming 4 days apart he doesn’t have the time to reinforce the messages, the mantra and practice it in the way he did during international breaks etc, and it seems the only bit the players have retained is ‘keep possession’ and forgotten the ‘and use it aggressively’ part.

Just keep the second half at Preston in your head. That’s what we are capable of.
 
With so many games in such a little time, I understand why Marti has tinkered and rotated certain players. He must surely be realising that the squad doesn't have enough quality in depth for it to be successful. We struggle to put a quality 11 out when everyone's fit.
 
With this wet winter weather, when it's like nightfall at midday, I've decided our team's problem is they suffer from Seasonal Affective Disorder. So, at present, they're a bunch of SAD bastards. Please bring a bit of sunshine into all our lives, Marti...
 
  • Like
Reactions: rangercol
So we are not going to get upset when we sell Dykes to some Scottish team in January and use the small amount of money to take a punt on some lower league hopeful.