Three promoted sides.

Have you really spent less than £10m?! I stand corrected!

 

Premier League Relegation Betting Odds

http://www.oddschecker.com/football/english/premier-league/relegation

 

Premier League To Stay Up Betting Odds

http://www.oddschecker.com/football/english/premier-league/to-stay-up

 

My apologies ,that was a very distasteful comment .........

 

Barton was on a free wasn't he? What about swp?

Rangers wage bill is bound to be higher than norwichs

 

Does it really matter how much we've spent? We've both punched above our weight, we've both given the big clubs tough games (Us; Chelsea, Man U away, you; Beating Chelsea, nearly scaring Man City)

 

This is the PL table matches v teams in the top half:

http://www.statto.com/football/stats/england/premier-league/2011-2012/versus-top-half/full

 

If only that was the real table

 

In fairness, the "teams in the top half" we've played were Liverpool, Man City, Arsenal and Chelsea away, and Man U at home!

 

TBH
I don't really care about Norwich or Swans as they are not going to make/break QPR's season.

As far as i am concerned we are doing okay at the moment and NW will be getting funds in January to make our squad stronger. TF and the Mttals are they real deal and will make QPR a competitive club on and off the field.

Any club would want our backers and if they say they wouldn't they are talking rubbish.

People can moan about Barton and Adel but at the end of the day most comments about them are from jealous and bitter muppets.

They like SWP, Young, Ferdinand, Traore would walk into any of the promoted clubs but they play for QPR and not them.

Had it all last season '15 points deduction', 'one man team', 'NW only plays long ball' and we proved them wrong. We were the best team in the Championship and are doing okay in the Premiership so as far as im concerned i think people should worry about their own clubs because we are doing good.

 

well said.

 

Doing well, not doing good

 

It's doing good for us R's fans...

 

Great post mate

 

I'm sure I had this discussion last year, but I can definitively say I wouldn't want millionaire backers who've bought in, unless I was convinced they were lifelong fans of the club they bought. If they ever decide to leave, it can be at the cost of administration and the only people who ultimately suffer are the fans. People like Dave Whelan, for example, just keep pumping money in and credit to them, but if they stop? You've got problems, and I for one am very glad we have a board of low paid directors and don't rely on cash-rich backers.

 

Theoretically, the Financial Fair-Play rules being brought in will address these anomalies, but already there is backtracking by Platini having seen Man City's half million a day loss figures, so as usual the big teams will get away with it whilst the smaller teams fall ever further behind. Trouble is, if two or three big teams face expulsion over finances they'll end up walking away and setting up the Super League outside FIFA/UEFA jurisdiction.

 

It'd be interesting to see how many teams would be abiding by the fair play rules if they existed today. Ourselves... Wolves and Blackpool maybe? Norwich? Arsenal? Can't be many...

 

Just look at Scotland, Rangers, Hearts and Dunfermline all on the brink. It'll happen here sooner or later and it'll send a real shockwave through the game. The Inland Revenue are pushing to end football clubs ability to exclude the full tax debts when they go into administration, look at what Leeds got away with...

 

No i mean't what i said, it was not a mistake.
'We are doing good'

 

Shame on you SN23! You live in London, yet you appear to have no knowledge of the Londoners' inability to speak proper, understandable English!