Just sat down. A few scabs with their “Jews against genocide” banner but a small gathering compared to the London ones I’ve seen. Nothing against them doing it but just seems pointless apart from making people feel like they’re doing something.
WAR! What is it good for?
- Thread starter Treble
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Just sat down. A few scabs with their “Jews against genocide” banner but a small gathering compared to the London ones I’ve seen. Nothing against them doing it but just seems pointless apart from making people feel like they’re doing something.
Just the 25000 dead in Dresden from our 4000t of bombs. Israel are amateurs really. There aren’t many good guys in war. Just bad guys and worse guys.
I was going to mention Dresden and the carpet-bombing but as that topic had previously been covered off by an Israel spokesman, in a news media outburst I thought it best avoided, but it's a valid point you make.
So you avoided the context, that showed three other present days wars, that you ignore, where bigger atrocities are happening, just so you only focus on the Jews and Israeli's, ok. You really don't see your own prejudices.
Not at all ... just skipped to the chase ... you seem to brush over Palestinian casualties... what's your take on the 4,200 dead kids? ... acceptable collateral damage? or abhorrent and never, ever, acceptable / justifiable?
I'm with the latter take btw ... for the avoidance of doubt ...
Not sure your point here, I've always spoken out about Nagasaki, in particular, especially as the bomb was never meant to have been dropped there. The pilots couldn't drop on the intended target, but at the same time couldn't return with their payload, so dropped it on Nagasaki. Although Nagasaki was an original target it had been dropped from the list. I've always pointed at these two atrocities that the US committed, so if you are trying to score yourself brownie points, you failed. I only mentioned Dresden in reply to Westy for the reasons given within that comment.
My mention of both was really just a comment on context of war crimes ... and the irony that the 'guardians of the free world' are actually the worst perpetrators in modern history...
Nothing is ever acceptable in collateral damage, but that's the horrors of war, even more so when the invisible enemy hide behind women and children, when they hide under hospitals and in UN facilities, when they cross the border and burn babies alive, and butcher people's sons, daughters, brothers, sisters, mothers and fathers. It's horrendus that 4,200 kids are dead, but likewise it's horrific when 400,000 people are killed in another present day war, it's horrific when 100,000 are killed at another geographic location in the world, 500,000 and not a word from you about them, no focus from you whatsoever, you are anti-Israel and it's your only interest, you care no more for those dead, than you did for any of the other hundreds of thousands killed in present day wars.
Stay out of it Abe, you've clearly got nowt to say, than back up Fosse with pointless interjecter.
You can agree with him as much as you like, but at least type something worth reading, and in your own words.
Anyway, I'm off to watch football now so fill your boots.
if on;y the yanks had stuck with fire bombing.
should point out that while being no consolation to those who died or had radiation poisoning later it is certain that the nukes saved lives .