You'll do anything to shed the fat bearded wino image it seems.
just as well you didn't see how i got it

You'll do anything to shed the fat bearded wino image it seems.

The People said:SPORTSWEAR giant Nike are hot favourites to sign a £10million-a-year deal with Mike Ashley to sponsor St James’ Park.
And People Sport understands that the firm’s world-famous swoosh trademark could be adorning Newcastle United’s old stadium and the team’s shirts in time for Christmas as part of a potential five-year agreement.
Other leading US companies have expressed an interest since Toon owner, sportswear tycoon Ashley, announced that St James’ Park would be known as the Sports Direct Arena until new sponsors could be found.
Financial experts have also talked up the likes of O2 and Virgin Money with the banking arm of Richard Branson’s empire taking over Newcastle shirt sponsors Northern Rock this week.
But Nike – who employ 30,000 people globally – are the main contenders.
Newcastle managing director Derek Llambias admitted: “There is little money anywhere in the United Kingdom or Europe."
Would all of the Sports Direct signs have to be removed from the stadium if someone does come in for the naming rights?
Unless they have some inexplicable desire to advertise a rival sportswear firm in a stadium named after themselves, I imagine so. It's honestly always seemed to me to be as though the Sports Direct adverts slapped all over the place were to show off marketing and advertising potential to a buyer or, as it turns out, stadium sponsor.
That's what they've used as the excuse for that. You have to wonder whether it has been that hard to find a company interested in that much advertising space at the prices MA/DL wanted, or whether it was just intended as next to free advertising.
Wasn't aware that they'd used any excuse or whatever. Of course he would use every chance he's got to spam his company name all over the place but it makes sense that if you're going to try attract as many companys as possible to purchasing your stadium rights that you would want them to see the huge possibilities for advertising that would be theirs if they went for it.
Is there just me who isn't excited by the idea of having a strip 'designed' by nike?
I disagree with the 2nd part of that sentence...Ashley did NOT need to plaster SD all over St James' Park. As someone has said earlier, do we not have computers anymore? The stuff our own fans have done with photoshop is ridiculous, I'm fairly sure he could've employed someone to CGI his ugly badges all over the place.
He's been given world wide recognition, a **** load of advertising both visually and in newspaper print and all for the paltry price of **** all!
But the first part of my sentence basically explains it. The man was obviously going to promote his own company, he even said when he bought the club that one of his primary aims was to use NUFC to promote his own company. I was originally just explaining that I thoroughly believe the SD adverts will be replaced with Nike or other Nike brand adverts if Nike were to buy the stadium, because those ads are where they are to boost the visibility of the brand that wants to advertise there. You just said yourself he has been given world wide recognition and a **** load of advertising because he has done that - and this is something Photoshop cannot prove.