I think the Jones one was harsh, it was a yellow imo, but it's a subjective decision and it's one that can go either way, and pales into insignificance with the offside shambles.
I'd have accepted it more if Hooper had given it at the time, but he gave a yellow, and VAR called him to review and showed him footage heavily weighted to make him change his mind.
Yes, I'm a Liverpool fan, but I'm also a supporter of fair play and justice - I think VAR should stop showing these stills and slo-mo reels that make things look worse than they are. Real-time replays first- at better angles than the ref had - would be a better way of helping him come to a fair conclusion, then slo-mo and stills if he's still unsure.
I was out and missed the Kovacic ones - I'll have to take a look.
what we have to ask ourselves here is this, (now that enough time has passed.)
was hoopers yellow a clear and obvious error?
aka should var have intervened and asked him to look again?
if the answer is yes then the next question is whether var have a right to pause a shot on the worst possible angle and exclude other angles.
are they assisting or are they painting a picture to get what they want?
then roll forward to a clear an obvious vsr error
then roll forward to a ref who's had a half time to know he's mind after seeing the red and offside (if he is even competent he would want to see all at ht)
and find said ref going out of his way to throw yellow after yellow at lfc players including a non foul trip over himself yellow thst jota got for being near a spurs player followed by a yellow on a lunge that other refs the following week refuse to give.
we sit here having seeing kovacic let off far worse than both Jones and Jota.