Todays Games

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Good to see Spurs continue winning under Big Ange.

Where did Brighton losing by such a large total come from?
Where did Wolves beating City come from ( but gee, we love it ) ?
United lost .......... ( nothing new here, move along ).
 
  • Like
Reactions: kiwiqpr
VAR reached a new low in the Liverpool game.
I'm really pleased the scousers lost, but apparently the VAR ref said "check over" by mistake, instead of "it was onside"!!
They've apologised, again.
It's a ****ing joke.
Anyone watching that game knew Diaz was onside.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QPR999
VAR reached a new low in the Liverpool game.
I'm really pleased the scousers lost, but apparently the VAR ref said "check over" by mistake, instead of "it was onside"!!
They've apologised, again.
It's a ****ing joke.
Anyone watching that game knew Diaz was onside.

That's why l reckon its should be the referees eyesight and nothing else.

Here in Oz, the rugby league has had major issues with VAR, so they appointed another 3 referees known as The Bunker, to further scrutinize and they still manage to stuff it up like you wouldn't believe. They were looking for any reason to give a try, even when they fumbled it; then they were looking for any reason not to give a try. Its a complete farce. Too many cooks in the kitchen.

Possible answer - Back the TV cameras away and let the game flow like it used to before todays technology.
Less visible scrutiny.............. onus back on the ref. If the ref is no good, get rid and bring in another.
 
That's why l reckon its should be the referees eyesight and nothing else.

Here in Oz, the rugby league has had major issues with VAR, so they appointed another 3 referees known as The Bunker, to further scrutinize and they still manage to stuff it up like you wouldn't believe. They were looking for any reason to give a try, even when they fumbled it; then they were looking for any reason not to give a try. Its a complete farce. Too many cooks in the kitchen.

Possible answer - Back the TV cameras away and let the game flow like it used to before todays technology.
Less visible scrutiny.............. onus back on the ref. If the ref is no good, get rid and bring in another.
Bunker always gave against the wahs
 
  • Like
Reactions: Didley Squat
There used to be arguments concerning refereeing decisions after ever game.
Now there's arguments after every game concerning VAR decisions.
Nothing has changed or improved.
Keep goal line technology and scrap the rest.
 
There used to be arguments concerning refereeing decisions after ever game.
Now there's arguments after every game concerning VAR decisions.
Nothing has changed or improved.
Keep goal line technology and scrap the rest.

I said that from the outset. It's got worse rather than better.
 
VAR reached a new low in the Liverpool game.
I'm really pleased the scousers lost, but apparently the VAR ref said "check over" by mistake, instead of "it was onside"!!
They've apologised, again.
It's a ****ing joke.
Anyone watching that game knew Diaz was onside.

Officiating in the game has become a complete joke ...

You must log in or register to see media