‘No history whatsoever’ - after one google search:
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/bbc-presenter-andrew-neil-mislead-14969304
https://www.thecanary.co/uk/2017/11...-fake-tory-statistics-general-election-video/
https://evolvepolitics.com/bbc-pres...-fake-figures-to-spin-tory-economic-failures/
https://bellacaledonia.org.uk/2021/01/11/truth-and-trust-correcting-the-record-and-andrew-neil/
https://www.thenational.scot/news/1...ils-brexit-supply-chain-claims-question-time/
https://theconversation.com/uk-elec...-much-of-a-problem-are-doctored-videos-126897
https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminsti...iers-haul-out-a-daft-conspiracy-theory-about-
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/bbc-presenter-andrew-neil-mislead-14969304
Regarding the alleged NASA graph, he put it out without context but implying that the issue of climate change is either exaggerated or improving. I have supplied the official NASA perspective on this.
James O’Brien is simply the other side of the same coin, I have no doubt that he spreads equally false crap. Both these creeps, part of the odious class that loves the sound of its own voice and has opinions for money, make my skin crawl. But pointing out the sins of one does not absolve or disprove the sins of the other.
Best to ignore both, neither are sources of authority in anything.
I like James O’B. Brextards don’t like the truth much.