True. Your comment ‘could be bollox’ is useful as it signifies Twitterati
I’m just looking for a comment to suggest reliability
However, there’s lots of bollox on twitter
How much do we want?
bollox (damn unicode doesn't work on here!)
True. Your comment ‘could be bollox’ is useful as it signifies Twitterati
I’m just looking for a comment to suggest reliability
However, there’s lots of bollox on twitter
How much do we want?
Oh yes. My post was on the proviso that they offer in the region of what you say. Maybe even 30m. Not their current stupid offers. What is it with everyone thinking they can bid 50% of the asking price as an openingTheir first 2 bids were below £20m so not necessarily. I think if they did offer something huge like £35-£40m then we should sell for the reasons you have stated. But as we have to give a sell-on to Chelsea, anything less and we may as well keep hold of him.
You must log in or register to see media
Could be bollox but think this is going to happen
I expect we’ll have to invest the majority of the profit in Aarons. Wonder what is happening with Bree. He doesn’t seem to fit but seemed a good performer in the championship. Not sure why Luton don’t want him back as he seemed to fit their side. Perhaps we’ve raised his wages too muchI like Tino (obviously), but he's always been the one that I'm most relaxed about selling. And that's largely because of the risk that he might never be the same again after his injury.
Get a decent £30m fee for him, invest just a fraction of it in Aarons, and I'll be happy (and will wish him all the best). If we could keep KWP too, then even better.
Eh? Aarons would not cost £20million, or anywhere near that.I expect we’ll have to invest the majority of the profit in Aarons. Wonder what is happening with Bree. He doesn’t seem to fit but seemed a good performer in the championship. Not sure why Luton don’t want him back as he seemed to fit their side. Perhaps we’ve raised his wages too much

People are saying we potentially owe 40% of any profit to chelsea. So to get 20m we’d need to sell for 38m which it doesn’t seem like newcastle will go to. But we can hope.Eh? Aarons would not cost £20million, or anywhere near that.
As worn by footy fans on transfer rumours threads.Maybe I'm Tom-cursing it, but I reckon it's all bollocks.
Tino going = bollocks
Max Aarons = total bollocks
You must log in or register to see media

It would simply be for squad depth I think. Or maybe to get McCarthy off the books.Deeply underwhelming if so. I also hope it’s not true as I’ve decided I don’t like “Tactically Matt”![]()