No. What have they done?You seen the new/old offside rule yet?![]()
No. What have they done?You seen the new/old offside rule yet?![]()
With the new rule in place, an attacker's entire body would have to be beyond the last defender for it to be deemed offside.No. What have they done?
Whole body including both feet? Don't link The Sun dude.With the new rule in place, an attacker's entire body would have to be beyond the last defender for it to be deemed offside.
Not sure it it's for this season tbh
Dunno![]()
Imo it should be the feet so in that picture if his leading foot was level and his body leaning then that's okay.You must log in or register to see images
This would not be offside.
Yeh not offsideYou must log in or register to see images
This would not be offside.
You must log in or register to see images
This would not be offside.
See my last. I think what I'm saying rules out running styles etc and it goes off the leading foot. I think that makes sense.I'd say that's how it should be.
I disagree. This isn't as easy as we thought.Yeh not offside

See my last. I think what I'm saying rules out running styles etc and it goes off the leading foot. I think that makes sense.
But the leading foot surely?Exactly, it should never be the body, only the feet.
But the leading foot surely?
ExactlyI disagree. This isn't as easy as we thought.![]()

I disagree but I think your opinion is better than the current situation where you can be offside with your nose and such nonsense.both feet for me.
I disagree but I think your opinion is better than the current situation where you can be offside with your nose and such nonsense.
They're ****s bro I think the link was hidden in the quote.Whole body including both feet? Don't link The Sun dude.![]()