Absolutely Uber. Absolutely
He is not the only one who has asked young people for "pictures" either
He is not the only one who has sent threatening emails/ text messages when threatened with being told about.
Those without sin can casts stones...
Off Topic The Politics Thread
- Thread starter Stroller
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
He is not the only one who has asked young people for "pictures" either
He is not the only one who has sent threatening emails/ text messages when threatened with being told about.
Those without sin can casts stones...
Oh and wasn't Boris supposed to hand over his phone to the Covid commission recently
Why has Nadine Dorries been refered to the parliamentary commission about comments made about her peerage
All seems to be missing from the headlines recently.
Surely a coincidence
Why has Nadine Dorries been refered to the parliamentary commission about comments made about her peerage
All seems to be missing from the headlines recently.
Surely a coincidence
He’s playing the mental health card because he’s been caught out. Wouldn’t be the first one
No I said it was an offence to illicit a photo from a 17 year old.
The young person in question appears to say he never asked / illicitly a photo.
So no offence in this case.
so it is a mental health issue to have gay thoughts....oh dear that us a bold thought
And as said to Goldhawk...Huw Edwards appears to have had certified mental health issues going back near 20 years. I understand these are severe depression issues, that he has be hospitalised for.
No playing the card here
Eh ? I really confused now. Surely if he paid the 17 year old £35,000 for some dirty pics then that, by its nature, is meaning to illicit a photo from a 17 year old ?
i honestly don’t get our first statement and it seems somewhat strange to mention gay thoughts as no one has mentioned this before ? Please explain
Who said he paid a 17 year old money for pictures.
Not the Met police ...no further action taken
Not the 17 year old...he has denied it.
Oh yes ....the Sun says it must be true then....they were right about those 97 drunken scousers weren't they
Not the Met police ...no further action taken
Not the 17 year old...he has denied it.
Oh yes ....the Sun says it must be true then....they were right about those 97 drunken scousers weren't they
Maybe his/her parents are saying it and they are worried about their child. Are you related in some way to Mr Edwards because you seem to be singing his innocence and reasons for his vile behaviour somewhat
I guess you’ve read it back and it doesn’t make sense even to you who wrote it
So worried about it they waited 3 years to do something
Didn't answer 2 contacts from the BBC.
Seems you’ve chosen your side Beth......the side of vile perversion so it seems.
Shame on you....I’m quite disappointed
Let's see how it plays out, Beth. Sounds like he was sane enough arrange to pay youngsters for indecent images. And other complaints have come in.
I've got your back Beth. It's all a huge distraction. The bloke hasn't committed a crime, he might be weird/perverted but the gutter press that is the Sun newspaper has made this mainstream news. It's all a load of ****e. Some BBC presenter had some naughty pics of a 17 year old lad and it's all over the news. Some rich Tory bitch steals millions of tax payers money in dodgy PPE deals and shes still living it large somewhere without a mention. It's all a ploy to look over there!
I mention Mone often Bob......still doesn’t make Edwards any less of a wrong ‘un
A lot of vile stuff isn’t illegal….but it doesn’t make it any less vile and any less damaging to the victims