YesWas that in response to Bairstow’s stumping?
YesWas that in response to Bairstow’s stumping?
It was the end of the over. The Square Leg umpire was on the move, he wasn't trying to steal a single or gain any sort of advantage. It's pathetic from the Australians to steal a wicket like that. Genuinely embarrassing for themVery poor from Bairstow imo, he walked out of his crease before checking where the ball had gone only seconds after it had passed him, I think the commentator said he had done it before. I think Anderson and Bairstow could be rested in the next test without weakening the side too much. And what a find Tongue looks, great debut.
It was something like "that's all you be remembered for now"
Very poor from Bairstow imo, he walked out of his crease before checking where the ball had gone only seconds after it had passed him, I think the commentator said he had done it before. I think Anderson and Bairstow could be rested in the next test without weakening the side too much. And what a find Tongue looks, great debut.
and of course, like any bully when the abuse is directed back tiwards them, they are all crying about it.They got pelter s in the long room too.
Very unlike Lords behaviour but nice to see.
If Smith and his other cronies can live with the whole sandpaper thing I’m sure Carey will live with what he did. Best way to deal with it is to win the series 3 - 2 and get in their faces then. The Aussies are never going to change. Just in their DNA as a team
I can almost understand Mankad because the non-striker is trying to gain an advantage by backing up out of his crease in the attempt to potentially steal a single.Hundreds, literally hundreds of batsmen have done this in the past. The batsman gains no advantage, as with a Mankad.
It was devious, sly and completely against the spirit of the game. Carey, ( and Cummins, probably Smith too if they were involved) will always be known as a cheat for doing it . Always.
Agreed. Some batsmen almost deserve a Mankad, stealing yards sometimes.I can almost understand Mankad because the non-striker is trying to gain an advantage by backing up out of his crease in the attempt to potentially steal a single.
In this instance, Bairstow was simply walking to chat to his mate between overs. For Carey to do it, Cummins to uphold the appeal and Cameron ****ing Green celebrate "taking a wicket" was ****ing embarrassing from the supposed World Champions.
This supposed "new Australia" that was born out of the sandpaper scandal is utter bullshit. They claim catches that they have dropped, they tamper with the pitch, they steal wickets and they cry when teams sledge them.Agreed. Some batsmen almost deserve a Mankad, stealing yards sometimes.
But this was desperate stuff from a team that has cheated more than once before under pressure.
Hundreds, literally hundreds of batsmen have done this in the past. The batsman gains no advantage, as with a Mankad.
It was devious, sly and completely against the spirit of the game. Carey, ( and Cummins, probably Smith too if they were involved) will always be known as a cheat for doing it . Always.
The underarm one was one of the Chappel brothers if I can remember ok? Nothing like bring a bit of class to the table….They can't help it. Going way back they have stretched the rules more than any other team. Even bowling underarm for God's sake, and that was forty years ago.
We'll never know what they've been doing and not caught at though, that's the thing. They are like a sprinter who has a drug record. The achievement is always tainted.