Fake.You must log in or register to see media
first signing
They have enough to spend £20m on a player if they want to have any hope of staying up.
Said it multiple times before but because of the clauses City have on him, any less than £50m for Lavia and the transfer doesn't make economic sense, we might as well wait for City to come back for him later on.
Would sort of agree, but that's on the presumption that City would be wanting to come back in for him, which is a long way from certain.
It serves clubs to pay the price this summer as if we come back up next year i wonder whether or not the bigger clubs will likely have to pay more.
Well not it City want him next summer as that’s when the buy back comes in
If we keep Lavia for a year our chances of promotion go up A LOT. Selling to City next year for 30m is a better deal than selling to Liverpool now for 60m if you ask me.

You must log in or register to see media

He would be a fine squad player if on the right wages. I doubt he was willing to accept the level of wages that we consider a championship squad player though.Apparently he said he rejected an extension.
With all due respect, why did we even offer him one?
He can swuad off then.He would be a fine squad player if on the right wages. I doubt he was willing to accept the level of wages that we consider a championship swuad player though.
Recognising the negative comments often made about him, and that it would have helped if he had scored more etc etc, I wish him the best for the future. Clearly with his fellow teammates he has a persona and willingness to support the Club in the community that made him popular with them.You must log in or register to see media
Recognising the negative comments often made about him, and that it would have helped if he had scored more etc etc, I wish him the best for the future. Clearly with his fellow teammates he has a persona and willingness to support the Club in the community that made him popular with them.