That'd be a staged right.I don't know how funny he is but definitely a right leaning comic.
You must log in or register to see images
That'd be a staged right.I don't know how funny he is but definitely a right leaning comic.
You must log in or register to see images
Jokes about politicians are ok on here but whatever you do don't poke fun at Starmer. Talk about precious.
Replace Starmer with Sunak and it would have been hilarious. There would have been no doubt it was an training exercise, nothing about how calling him Dishy Rishi was playground stuff and certainly no need to post an explanation in large letters that it had omitted to tell everyone what was really going on.
I don’t think anyone on here remotely likes Starmer? The issue was the ‘jokes’ weren’t funny? Or presented as jokes?
I shouldn't have to explain this but calling Starmer Fat Keith wasn't the joke. The joke was pretending that Starmer was having a pleasant chat with a staff member and oblivious to a patient who was receiving CPR.
A satirical joke like you would see on Have I Got News For You. Of course you know that, but your "particular bias" gives you the opportunity to spout the self righteous clap trap commonly heard from those hilarious left leaning comedians.
And that joke would work if it was obvious that it was a dummy. But it wasn’t without taking a closer look. That meant it came across as serious. If it had been obvious then that is a joke. Context required really.
What self-righteous claptrap? That pretending you don’t know his name and calling a man fat are childish? I don’t join in with any of the name-calling - even for Rishi Sunak. I have never even referred to Boris Johnson as Bojo or Bozo. Just childish and undermines any point you want to make.
You guys are such ‘snowflakes’!I completely agree.
I look forward to scrolling through your previous comments on here bringing people into line when they have constantly berated members of the Tory party, in the guise of Lols, whilst commenting on personal details, such as you have described above.
But the likelihood is you haven’t, which confirms the OP claims of party bias.
Which is fine btw, just don’t get all bitchy when someone does it to the side you like.

You must log in or register to see media

Needs calling out on this one.You must log in or register to see media
Keir Starmer said earlier this year that the Labour Party would have "zero tolerance" to "racism, or discrimination of any kind," under his leadership.
This is very difficult to square with the decision to reinstate Neil Coyle.
You must log in or register to see media
Keir Starmer said earlier this year that the Labour Party would have "zero tolerance" to "racism, or discrimination of any kind," under his leadership.
This is very difficult to square with the decision to reinstate Neil Coyle.
You must log in or register to see media
Keir Starmer said earlier this year that the Labour Party would have "zero tolerance" to "racism, or discrimination of any kind," under his leadership.
This is very difficult to square with the decision to reinstate Neil Coyle.
Anti -vaxxers will get their own level of hell. Which is saying something coming from an atheist!You must log in or register to see media
The biggest threat is that, while we get much more rain over the course of a year now, we get very arid conditions in the summer. Much more so than previous, and we've had droughts that threatened or outright destroyed crops, and dried wells and reservoirs. That also wasn't the norm. When you have based the whole of your economy on the secondary agricultural market (read: we grow things and then turn them all into booze), that's a real problem.