Matt Hancock has told lawyers that he wants immunity regarding care home deaths during the Covid pandemic.
Some think that Matt Hancock and Boris Johnson should be pursued to the ends of the earth to bring justice for the tens of thousands of avoidable deaths.
You must log in or register to see images
mirror.co.uk
Matt Hancock told lawyers that he should be immune from court action.
He said that he should not be the target of judicial reviews regarding his department’s failure to safeguard care home residents simply because he was Secretary of State.
I don't know, but is asking for immunity not an admission of guilt![]()
More likely he's aware of how the system itself conspires to make only the person at the top guilty. There will have been thousands of decisions and actions made every week in his name as secretary of state that he will have known nothing about.
I tend to use the pandemic stockpile as an example here. At ministerial level all you'll be doing is asking about it's status. If the person who's responsible for that stockpile lies to the minister and says it's fine when there's a load of boxes that haven't even been opened in it (as the army found when they went into it), is that the Minister's fault? Should the Minister be be doing the weekly stock check?
I've yet to hear about a single individual in the NHS being sacked or even censured for abdicating their delegated responsibilities during COVID, but accepted logic seems to be that if you get rid of the person at the top nobody else needs to be at fault.
It's like if I ****ed up in my previous job and an aircraft crashed, I'd get away with it but the chief of the air staff would have to go.
