Why not just do without, could it be any worse?Maybe do without all political parties once AI gets up to speed ?
I think it depends on what you're doing and what you're like as an individual. I work from home (partly because my office is the best part of 2hrs away) and I find it very difficult to concentrate when I'm in the office. I am much more productive when I am on my own. There aren't people talking to me and I can get up from my desk and walk around or have the stuff that I'm working with spread out as far and wide as I like without disturbing anybody else. I am in regular contact with people in other offices via Teams and the phone so I don't feel like I miss out on any interaction (although I do avoid the petty office politics) or professional exchange.Leaked story says Labour plan to make it a legal right to be able to work from home.
This would be an awful policy in my opinion. I have battled with staff who since covid wont return to the office. I only ask for a min of 1 day, ideally 2 a week. About 20% persistently dont do it. It is clear to me we do less productive work at home, as a team. There is limited interactive teamwork, where ideas are shared and problems are solved. Innovation is down. Then as a manager I have a duty of care for staff wellbeing. Hard to do that when I dont see them. Some even refuse to turn on a camera on a video call. Flexible working is great, this is as inflexible though. All about workers rights, very little thought to employers responsibilities.
Then take the impact on the economy. The number of coffee shops, sandwhich shops etc that have closed because there isnt the worker footfall anymore. Offices stood empty. The list here is longer.
Then the social impact. We are social creatures us humans. We do better when we meet and talk and have personal interactions. A lot of that comes from being at work with people.
Horrible sounding thing this.
Leaked story says Labour plan to make it a legal right to be able to work from home.
This would be an awful policy in my opinion. I have battled with staff who since covid wont return to the office. I only ask for a min of 1 day, ideally 2 a week. About 20% persistently dont do it. It is clear to me we do less productive work at home, as a team. There is limited interactive teamwork, where ideas are shared and problems are solved. Innovation is down. Then as a manager I have a duty of care for staff wellbeing. Hard to do that when I dont see them. Some even refuse to turn on a camera on a video call. Flexible working is great, this is as inflexible though. All about workers rights, very little thought to employers responsibilities.
Then take the impact on the economy. The number of coffee shops, sandwhich shops etc that have closed because there isnt the worker footfall anymore. Offices stood empty. The list here is longer.
Then the social impact. We are social creatures us humans. We do better when we meet and talk and have personal interactions. A lot of that comes from being at work with people.
Horrible sounding thing this.
Leaked story says Labour plan to make it a legal right to be able to work from home.
This would be an awful policy in my opinion. I have battled with staff who since covid wont return to the office. I only ask for a min of 1 day, ideally 2 a week. About 20% persistently dont do it. It is clear to me we do less productive work at home, as a team. There is limited interactive teamwork, where ideas are shared and problems are solved. Innovation is down. Then as a manager I have a duty of care for staff wellbeing. Hard to do that when I dont see them. Some even refuse to turn on a camera on a video call. Flexible working is great, this is as inflexible though. All about workers rights, very little thought to employers responsibilities.
Then take the impact on the economy. The number of coffee shops, sandwhich shops etc that have closed because there isnt the worker footfall anymore. Offices stood empty. The list here is longer.
Then the social impact. We are social creatures us humans. We do better when we meet and talk and have personal interactions. A lot of that comes from being at work with people.
Horrible sounding thing this.
Yeah mate, I agree. Certainly wouldnt want to go back to everybody in one place, being able to work remotely is a good thing in balance. Just feels a bit like throwing the baby out with the bathwater to me. We had plenty of good things in a work environment pre covid, and we learned new good things during it. Just keep the best of both worlds for me. If it becomes a legal right I know 4 people will write to me on day 1 asking for it, none of which really need it imo.I generally agree with all of your points, you obviously know your stuff.
All I would say is that there's another aspect that was apparent during Covid when millions of unnecessary journeys didn't happen. In a past life I was regularly flying around Europe 'on business' when a Skype call, even phones calls, would've easily done the job.
A lot of business travel is pointless, even worse in councils. NHS, etc.
Yeah for lots of people it is a positive. Certainly dont think all people are not productive.
I run large IT programmes and I find teamworking is best when in person, for somethings anyway. When we are troubleshooting nothing beats an office with some good old fashioned scribbling and debating. Mostly now I end up some in the office and some online and I find that not as productive as it would be. I also find when I am in the office I bump into people I didnt know I would benefit from seeing. Hearing about something that otherwise I wouldnt have heard about.
Then there is the quick pint after work on occassion. Miss that to be honest.
Think there’ll be too many objections for it to become a right . The other side are going to argue it’s the employer/ company’s “ right” to say working on premises is a requirement of the job. As has been said , nothing to stop employer agreeing some home working to individuals if it suits both parties and productivity and quality can be trusted
No. The majority of 16 year olds are impulsive and don't have the maturity to think through their choices. That's why Corbyn and the SNP have both been keen on lowering the voting age because they know that, in general, 16 year olds are more likely to vote for something that appears to be radical or that rebels against things that they see as 'the establishment' without completely considering the consequences.Should we lower the voting age to 16? At 16 you can get a job and pay taxes. Shouldnt they have a right to vote on how govt use their money?
Should we lower the voting age to 16? At 16 you can get a job and pay taxes. Shouldnt they have a right to vote on how govt use their money?
Should we lower the voting age to 16? At 16 you can get a job and pay taxes. Shouldnt they have a right to vote on how govt use their money?
I’ve “ liked” because of you sharing the knowledge , not sure I like the situation you’ve shared!FUN FACT: England is the ONLY country in the world to have privatised its ENTIRE water system.
This is absolutely true, some people never mature or develop an understanding of the consequences of their actions. But by leaving the voting age at 18 you are limiting the possibility of results being skewed by populists or other bad actors who are relying on the votes of what are still legally children. If you need to lower the voting age to get elected or ensure you stay in power, there has to be something fundamentally wrong with your campaigning- your policies and governance clearly doesn't convince enough of the adult population.Absolutely. 16 seems fair to me.
Millions of people voted for Brexit despite not thinking through the consequences (some probably did).
Millions voted for Corbyn/Boris/SNP/BNP etc. despite being "old enough" to know better.
I don't forsee a Green rebellion or a rise in Communism just because 16 year olds get to make a choice to vote.
Yes if they have an idea of what’s going on , no if they’ll just vote for whoever their favourite pop or reality star favours. Impractical, but a simple test to pass to qualify for a vote. Hold on though , then we should have a test before trusting many adults with a voteShould we lower the voting age to 16? At 16 you can get a job and pay taxes. Shouldnt they have a right to vote on how govt use their money?