Coronavirus

Boris...


  • Total voters
    24
Status
Not open for further replies.
Is there really any point to you being on here apart from putting stupid **** up by some unknowns on twitter

brb can you ban this fling idiot from this thread it’s totally child like and really doesn’t add nothing


Ps take Julian out as well brb no need him being here he also adds nothing to conversation
 
Last edited:
So still no answer from the bill gates fan club on here as to why they have turned backs on the vaccine injured
 
Three years


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-65038607

Was no real need for lockdowns or vaccinations.
There clearly was a need imo but managed in the correct way, some people seemed to react badly to the virus it was really odd, just take Haig as an example he sadly passed away and his wife was very ill. I don't know if there were underlying conditions though.

The vast majority though got a type of flu, one that was more contagious than anything I've ever seen.

Now if vulnerable people had shielded and the rest of the world had helped them out then great it would be manageable and sensible. Instead we had the world locked down unless you fancied something to eat, you could then go out for a meal in a place full of other people then go home again.

Millions spent by idiots.
 
There clearly was a need imo but managed in the correct way, some people seemed to react badly to the virus it was really odd, just take Haig as an example he sadly passed away and his wife was very ill. I don't know if there were underlying conditions though.

The vast majority though got a type of flu, one that was more contagious than anything I've ever seen.

Now if vulnerable people had shielded and the rest of the world had helped them out then great it would be manageable and sensible. Instead we had the world locked down unless you fancied something to eat, you could then go out for a meal in a place full of other people then go home again.

Millions spent by idiots.


Sad with Haig, he thought he was safe, that it was a con.
Guy local to me died, he thought the same, 38. Left his Mrs and 3 kids, all went and got a vaccination after he had died
 
  • Like
Reactions: Edelman
Sad with Haig, he thought he was safe, that it was a con.
Guy local to me died, he thought the same, 38. Left his Mrs and 3 kids, all went and got a vaccination after he had died
That's the big conundrum and it's not clear at all. Some people clearly had a serious reaction to the virus and it's clear that some are now having a clear reaction to the vaccine. Proper testing should not be done to prevent any complications but imo they don't want to do that as if they find problems then it'll be carnage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb and aberdude
This is where the 2 sides in this argument need to back off, it seems lots of people know people who died "because" of the virus and lots know people who died "because" of the vaccine.

How about some proper research is done before more peoples lives are risked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb and aberdude
That's the big conundrum and it's not clear at all. Some people clearly had a serious reaction to the virus and it's clear that some are now having a clear reaction to the vaccine. Proper testing should not be done to prevent any complications but imo they don't want to do that as if they find problems then it'll be carnage.

Trouble is it’s the government which took the burden of compensation

now they wanna pretend nothing’s gone wrong…..says it all with an empty parliament when a fellow MP gives a speech on said subject

ignorance is bliss hey..

shame really that they’ve turned backs on the very same people who trusted in the process
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb and luvgonzo
Trouble is it’s the government which took the burden of compensation

now they wanna pretend nothing’s gone wrong…..says it all with an empty parliament when a fellow MP gives a speech on said subject

ignorance is bliss hey..

shame really that they’ve turned backs on the very same people who trusted in the process
That's what I meant in my last post. Forget all this arguing between people who have different opinions just test the **** out of it now and make sure it's safe. Won't do that though because it might not be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aberdude
This is where the 2 sides in this argument need to back off, it seems lots of people know people who died "because" of the virus and lots know people who died "because" of the vaccine.

How about some proper research is done before more peoples lives are risked.

that’s what Andrew the Tory mp wanted……..seems a logical response gor sensible people that
 
  • Like
Reactions: luvgonzo
I agree, we have to communicate even when we disagree. For that to happen in the commons was a disgrace.

Bridgen didn’t have a debate, he had an adjournment debate. He was able to make a statement at the end of the day without anyone being able to respond apart from who he made comments to.
 
Oh right, I don't understand all that. I just though people decided not to attend because of the content.

I assume it's done like that because front benchers tend to tow the party line, or that of their boss, the Prime Minister.

Where back benchers are more your rebels and they raise topics which the rest of the party might not want to hear, mainly like what is closest to their hearts.

However, argument could be add that front benchers still know what has been said, but it's easier for them to dismiss it, otherwise they will muddy the waters and people might want to look into it properly, and we wouldn't want people doing that would we, no sireee.
 
Oh right, I don't understand all that. I just though people decided not to attend because of the content.

which, if you want can be made to look that way. (Speaker/deputy speakers also have to attend)

could be made to look like people walked out, wasn’t a busy commons day either. He needs to present his ‘truth’
 
Status
Not open for further replies.