Mason Greenwood

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
As if there isn't enough sex offenders on the street they've released ****ing Glitter now halfway through his sentence. ****.
 
He's been found guilty via trial by social media with a very limited snippet of the overall situation & evidence available.

I think a key part of the statement was the "new evidence" part. This could have been something that when presented to the prosecution and accuser, made them decide to withdraw the complaint...but we will never know.

The one thing I can't understand is, if they are still together/got back together like is being reported of your the female who made the accusation in the first place and it was true, then why would you go back and if you where the male who was accused and it wasn't true, why would you be with a the person who made the accusation
 
He's been found guilty via trial by social media with a very limited snippet of the overall situation & evidence available.

I think a key part of the statement was the "new evidence" part. This could have been something that when presented to the prosecution and accuser, made them decide to withdraw the complaint...but we will never know.

The one thing I can't understand is, if they are still together/got back together like is being reported of your the female who made the accusation in the first place and it was true, then why would you go back and if you where the male who was accused and it wasn't true, why would you be with a the person who made the accusation

Because people and relationships can be completely ****ed up.

Her father came out and defended Greenwood soon after she made the claims so the whole thing is pretty twisted.
 
Because people and relationships can be completely ****ed up.

Her father came out and defended Greenwood soon after she made the claims so the whole thing is pretty twisted.

She wanted to withdraw her complaint last April but the police ploughed on with it.
 
He's been found guilty via trial by social media with a very limited snippet of the overall situation & evidence available.

I think a key part of the statement was the "new evidence" part. This could have been something that when presented to the prosecution and accuser, made them decide to withdraw the complaint...but we will never know.

The one thing I can't understand is, if they are still together/got back together like is being reported of your the female who made the accusation in the first place and it was true, then why would you go back and if you where the male who was accused and it wasn't true, why would you be with a the person who made the accusation

It’s entirely possible the audio is genuine and reflects a coercive and abusive relationship and the girl decided to leak it impulsively to get back at him. It’s quite common for people to remain in abusive relationships or go back to abusive partners for several reasons, even after going as far as filing a police report about domestic violence. Some studies have suggested it takes women in particular 7 times to leave an abusive partner for good.

There’s a lot of different factors and can’t be boiled down to ‘she refused to be a cooperating witness anymore, therefore she’s a lying bitch’.
 
It’s entirely possible the audio is genuine and reflects a coercive and abusive relationship and the girl decided to leak it impulsively to get back at him. It’s quite common for people to remain in abusive relationships or go back to abusive partners for several reasons, even after going as far as filing a police report about domestic violence. Some studies have suggested it takes women in particular 7 times to leave an abusive partner for good.

There’s a lot of different factors and can’t be boiled down to ‘she refused to be a cooperating witness anymore, therefore she’s a lying bitch’.

Some studies have found that…Definitive proof then. Conversely there a lot of different factors and can’t be boiled down to the fact that she refused to be a cooperating witness anymore and there fore isn’t a lying bitch. Her father being on Greenwood’s side should be something for anyone with an open mind to consider.
 
It’s entirely possible the audio is genuine and reflects a coercive and abusive relationship and the girl decided to leak it impulsively to get back at him. It’s quite common for people to remain in abusive relationships or go back to abusive partners for several reasons, even after going as far as filing a police report about domestic violence. Some studies have suggested it takes women in particular 7 times to leave an abusive partner for good.

There’s a lot of different factors and can’t be boiled down to ‘she refused to be a cooperating witness anymore, therefore she’s a lying bitch’.

I never said she was a lying bitch and nor would I. In the same respect I wouldn't just automatically find him guilty and wish harm on him etc. Bar a very limited few, nobody will never know the full and truthful story, hence why I don't think it's fair to jump down on either side of the fence
 
Some studies have found that…Definitive proof then. Conversely there a lot of different factors and can’t be boiled down to the fact that she refused to be a cooperating witness anymore and there fore isn’t a lying bitch. Her father being on Greenwood’s side should be something for anyone with an open mind to consider.

You’re such a low-life but your attitude towards this isn’t the least bit surprising since you’ve previously defended grown men having sex with 14 and 15-year-old girls because the girls ‘seduced’ them.
 
You’re such a low-life but your attitude towards this isn’t the least bit surprising since you’ve previously defended grown men having sex with 14 and 15-year-old girls because the girls ‘seduced’ them.

When did I defend grown men having sex with 14 or 15 year olds because they seduced them you sad ****?Examples?
 
When did I defend grown men having sex with 14 or 15 year olds because they seduced them you sad ****?Examples?

Was on this very thread on your old account. Multiple people called you out on it after because it was such a despicable comment.

You must log in or register to see images
 
Was on this very thread on your old account. Multiple people called you out on it after because it was such a despicable comment.

You must log in or register to see images

Almost like I am defending Johnson…Almost? Not exactly then? I was calling out the double standards of people who had a go at Johnson whilst overlooking their favourite rock stars doing worse. The 14 year involved old with Jimmy Page initiated things, as she did with other rock stars, so se wasn’t an innocent. Though Page knew her age so had no excuses.
Going down to prayers this afternoon to ask why they worship someone who had set with a 9:year old?
 
Almost like I am defending Johnson…Almost? Not exactly then? I was calling out the double standards of people who had a go at Johnson whilst overlooking their favourite rock stars doing worse. The 14 year involved old with Jimmy Page initiated things, as she did with other rock stars, so se wasn’t an innocent. Though Page knew her age so had no excuses.
Going down to prayers this afternoon to ask why they worship someone who had set with a 9:year old?

See what I mean? Just whataboutism 24/7 by you, you boring prick. What double-standards? The only person mentioning Jimmy Page was you. Seems like you just want an excuse to defend grown men preying on underage girls. Very suspicious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SydneyTiger14
See what I mean? Just whataboutism 24/7 by you, you boring prick. What double-standards? The only person mentioning Jimmy Page was you. Seems like you just want an excuse to defend grown men preying on underage girls. Very suspicious.

You really are a thick twat aren’t, you? Typical of your thick generation who can only see in straight lines like a blinkered horse. If Johnson should be driven out of his profession or what he did why should others get a free pass on what they did? I expect double standards and hypocrisy from you as they are the hallmarks of a young leftie.
No condemnation of someone who had sex with a 9 year old? Wonder why?
 
You really are a thick twat aren’t, you? Typical of your thick generation who can only see in straight lines like a blinkered horse. If Johnson should be driven out of his profession or what he did why should others get a free pass on what they did? I expect double standards and hypocrisy from you as they are the hallmarks of a young leftie.
No condemnation of someone who had sex with a 9 year old? Wonder why?

Who had sex with a 9 year old?
 
It’s entirely possible the audio is genuine and reflects a coercive and abusive relationship and the girl decided to leak it impulsively to get back at him. It’s quite common for people to remain in abusive relationships or go back to abusive partners for several reasons, even after going as far as filing a police report about domestic violence. Some studies have suggested it takes women in particular 7 times to leave an abusive partner for good.

There’s a lot of different factors and can’t be boiled down to ‘she refused to be a cooperating witness anymore, therefore she’s a lying bitch’.

It’s 99.9% that that’s the case. I saw all the content when she posted it all that night and it fully reflects a very abusive relationship and controlling behaviour at that moment in time, I cannot see a way it could be played off as role play or any of the other ‘what if’ scenario’s people have mooted as this has played out. The fact that she has remained with him is neither here nor there. People do all sorts of seemingly illogical things that even they themselves couldn’t explain or justify. Maybe also he has changed his ways and manner because people can and do and they have now moved on as a couple which they are both fully entitled to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saf and Kalman
Status
Not open for further replies.