The problem is fans crave information on Club activity. That’s not exclusive to us either. Then when articles are written on leads, they get ripped to shreds or ridiculed. What’s the alternative that would keep the majority happy? Report nothing? Silence in print and broadcast? If you don’t like it, don’t read it or don’t listen to it. It’s pretty simple really.
you don't get anywhere near that free space in the championship that defending is actually laughable nice finish though
Should have claimed your account was hacked. The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.
My hope is that Sinik has a good second half of the season back in Turkey, comes back to us in the summer with more confidence and fights for a place. I like the kid. He’s got a bit of aggression and fight in him that you don’t often expect of wingers. I remember last game he played for City he came on as a sub and did everything humanly possible to keep the ball in play even though it was 99% destined to go out for a throw-in. From what I’ve seen of him for City, he’s not lazy nor shirks challenges.
Reading a board like this is probably a decent way for him, or any journo, to get tip offs of breaking news stories, rumours from the club etc. BUT, in his position he has a responsibility not to post such things without making some effort to fact-check them. Unlike most of us he can ask the club for comment and have a reasonable expectation that they might reply.
You'd think so wouldn't you, but the article yesterday had none of that, it was a quote Rosie gave him a few weeks ago re Scott and just "unnamed L1 club" nothing backed up or comment from the club etc ( unless I missed it ). Absolutely no issue with it. If he / hull live want to post that kind of article then crack on
Yep, there’s room in the market for both proper journalism and click-bait sensationalism. It’s a bit disappointing to me that there seems to be less of the former about these days, but commercially you give the market what it wants I guess.
Ironically, the likes of Vox and Vice are doing more cutting-edge investigative journalism these days than more traditional media. I watched a Vice documentary on YouTube a while ago and a couple of their journalists went to North Korea. Quite surreal. Vice also provided early evidence from 2014 that Russian forces were operating in Donbas without insignia alongside pro-Russian Ukrainian rebels.
7 yellow cards after the 98th minute. Gotta love these Turks. When they lose their discipline it’s like a volcano going off. Oh yeah a straight red on 62 mins as well.
I wasn’t suggesting he was getting stuff from here, it’s just that it feels like some are criticising him for being behind/wrong when he can only go off what he was told. With Celi, for all we know he could have been told it wasn’t happening by somebody who didn’t know the situation had changed, he prints his story and then learns to the contrary. He can’t help that with having to work in a short time frame. His source might need updating, though, if he’s feeding him incorrect stuff.
They do very good work, as do Byline Times (although I’m never sure of them because of their owner, his intentions never felt genuine).
