They'll have a whip round for him...That pitch intruder’s getting stoned in the morning.
That pitch intruder’s getting stoned in the morning.
Black boots and jumpers for goal posts, old schoolDarwin Nunez is pants.
Bentancur on the other hand has been excellent![]()
Probably moving to Europe soon, as he's increasingly raising his profile.I've just looked up the SK striker, he's Cho Gue Sung , decent player but I've not seen much of the SK league , who am I kidding , not seen a single game
He was the player that put 2 past us on the Korean tour and has a low buy out clause apparently
Can I just go back to the Southgate debate?
It seems to me there is only one thing that you need to know about his odd thinking and thus poor managerial ability. That is he plays someone who doesn't even play for his club, and he was always going to play him, apparently on the strength of what he did in the last tournament. *The last tournament!!!!!* With that "logic" (and it isn't logic) ...
It's hardly unique to SouthgateCan I just go back to the Southgate debate?
It seems to me there is only one thing that you need to know about his odd thinking and thus poor managerial ability. That is he plays someone who doesn't even play for his club, and he was always going to play him, apparently on the strength of what he did in the last tournament. *The last tournament!!!!!* With that "logic" (and it isn't logic), you could play anyone who played in a previous tournament ignoring anything that happened inbetween, alive or dead, right number of limbs or fewer, retired or still playing. The fact that many pundits have agreed with him is mental. And as for doing the right stuff to keep the squad together, how can it be right that any centre half, regardless of how well they are playing, can't displace someone that isn't even playing! Now you might say, "not Dier, because he hasn't played well", and you may have a point. Until you consider that you are comparing someone that is actually playing against someone that isn't. Because it isn't possible for a player that isn't playing to be seen to be playing badly, so he can't even be criticised for it! I can't emphasise how mad this situation is. But it's ok because he played ok against Iran and USA? And where would they finish in the PL? So we'll progress as we've done before, and as soon as we come up against a decent team we'll lose (with the proviso that you always have a punchers chance in a knock out game, except that Southgate also minimises that chance by his defensvie mindset).
It's hardly unique to Southgate
How long was Walcott in the squad based entirely on that one game against Croatia in 2008?
I get why Southgate kept faith with Maguire, his two performances so far have vindicated him.
It’s far from ideal that he’s not playing for his club but Southgate has built up a relationship with him and feels like he can trust him.
That said, if England lose tonight due to a Maguire mistake then Southgate is in deep trouble.
I don't think there are any teams in the World Cup who would win the PL so I can see why players like Maguire might be selected in the group games. However there are some teams who are better than England so we need to play our most skilful players in the later rounds. Paradoxically I think the side with the best chance of winning the final is more likely to lose early on.Can I just go back to the Southgate debate?
It seems to me there is only one thing that you need to know about his odd thinking and thus poor managerial ability. That is he plays someone who doesn't even play for his club, and he was always going to play him, apparently on the strength of what he did in the last tournament. *The last tournament!!!!!* With that "logic" (and it isn't logic), you could play anyone who played in a previous tournament ignoring anything that happened inbetween, alive or dead, right number of limbs or fewer, retired or still playing. The fact that many pundits have agreed with him is mental. And as for doing the right stuff to keep the squad together, how can it be right that any centre half, regardless of how well they are playing, can't displace someone that isn't even playing! Now you might say, "not Dier, because he hasn't played well", and you may have a point. Until you consider that you are comparing someone that is actually playing against someone that isn't. Because it isn't possible for a player that isn't playing to be seen to be playing badly, so he can't even be criticised for it! I can't emphasise how mad this situation is. But it's ok because he played ok against Iran and USA? And where would they finish in the PL? So we'll progress as we've done before, and as soon as we come up against a decent team we'll lose (with the proviso that you always have a punchers chance in a knock out game, except that Southgate also minimises that chance by his defensvie mindset).
